Outcome of inguinal hernia repair at two rural hospitals in northern Scotland

Introduction: Audit of inguinal hernia repair is important in view of the magnitude of the problem and the fact that it is a common operation often performed by surgical trainees. Due to the disparity of the results of various workers with regard to the rate of complications, individual surgeons have been advised to audit their patients' outcomes. Method: Retrospective audit was performed, of all the inguinal hernias repaired between 1997 and 2003 inclusive, at two rural hospitals in northern Scotland, under a single consultant. Data were gathered from a hospital database and by means of postal questionnaire specifically aimed at wound complications, recurrence and chronic groin pain. Results: One hundred and sixty-three inguinal hernias were repaired during this period. One hundred and fifty-eight questionnaires were sent to patients ascertained to be living at the time of audit initiation with a response from 129 (86%). At a mean follow-up of 4.34 years, no recurrences were noted and eight patients complained of chronic groin pain of whom only three (1.5%) were experiencing moderate to severe pain. The results achieved by senior house off cers were comparable to those obtained by the senior surgeon. Conclusion: The incidence of recurrence of hernia after open mesh repair of inguinal hernias is very low. Excellent outcomes can be obtained for inguinal hernia even at remote and rural hospitals in the hands of both experienced and trainee surgeons