The assessment of ankylosing spondylitis in clinical practice

In their Review, Dr Sengupta and Dr Stone outline the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis in the ambulatory care setting and in response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Although advances have been made in creating and validating outcome measures in this disease, the authors disc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature clinical practice. Rheumatology 2007-09, Vol.3 (9), p.496-503
Hauptverfasser: Stone, Millicent A, Sengupta, Raj
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In their Review, Dr Sengupta and Dr Stone outline the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis in the ambulatory care setting and in response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Although advances have been made in creating and validating outcome measures in this disease, the authors discuss the persistent need for suitable biomarkers to help with diagnosis and disease activity monitoring, in order to improve patient outcomes. Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis that predominantly affects the axial skeleton in adolescent patients causing spinal pain and stiffness. There is a marked delay, on average 8 years, between onset of disease symptoms and clinical diagnosis. The distinction between the symptoms of mechanical and inflammatory back pain remains one of the main contributing factors for the delay in diagnosis. Several classification criteria exist to aid the diagnosis of AS, but their accuracy is poor. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study group (ASAS) has defined a core set of domains for clinical outcome measurement in AS in order to assess the disease process in individual patients and to identify those with rapidly progressive disease. New therapies, such as the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, have transformed the treatment paradigm in AS, especially for those patients with aggressive disease. Thus, the definition of both patient selection criteria for these agents and the development of clinical methods to assess response to therapy have become a priority. This Review focuses on measuring the degree of disease activity, function and damage in patients with AS in an ambulatory care setting, and the assessment of suitability of various outcome measures for monitoring response to treatment with TNF inhibitors. Key Points The clinical assessment of AS remains a challenge for both researchers and clinicians The identification of the origin of inflammatory back pain using MRI facilitates earlier diagnosis of AS-related pain Assessment of clinical outcomes in practice should include spinal pain and stiffness, patient global, physical function, inflammation and spinal mobility There are clear country-specific guidelines for patient selection for anti-TNF therapy The ASAS-IC and the BASDAI 50 can be used in clinical practice to assess patient response to anti-TNF therapy
ISSN:1745-8382
1759-4790
1745-8390
1759-4804
DOI:10.1038/ncprheum0591