Validation of antibody screening by indirect antigloblin test and ABO blood typing by filtration and microplate techniques: assessment of robustness

According to requirements of the French Committee for Accreditation (Cofrac), it is essential to use validated and standardised methods in Immunohematology. This imposes first the knowledge of metrological tolerances for all the technics. Two multicenter studies were carried out to define the maxima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine 2006-10, Vol.13 (4), p.271-277
Hauptverfasser: Mannessier, L, Delamaire, M, Bouix, O, Krause, C, Roubinet, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 277
container_issue 4
container_start_page 271
container_title Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine
container_volume 13
creator Mannessier, L
Delamaire, M
Bouix, O
Krause, C
Roubinet, F
description According to requirements of the French Committee for Accreditation (Cofrac), it is essential to use validated and standardised methods in Immunohematology. This imposes first the knowledge of metrological tolerances for all the technics. Two multicenter studies were carried out to define the maximal acceptable deviations concerning incubation temperature and time, volumes of patient plasma and tests cells for antibody screening using indirect antiglobulin test on one hand and for reverse grouping on another hand. All equipment used (temperature test chamber, chronometer, pipettes) were calibrated according to Cofrac standards. The antibody screenings were performed manually using 3 different filtration systems: ID Diamed, Biovue Ortho and Scangel Biorad, the same tests cells, a standard 20 ng/mL anti RH1, a positive control anti KEL1 and a negative control; the reverse blood grouping was performed manually using the above mentionned filtration systems and microplate technic with the same A1 and B test cells. These two studies showed that all the tests from the multiples combinations of the above parameters gave the same results and allowed us to define a range of tolerance for 4 critical physical parameters involved in the antibody screening and blood typing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tracli.2006.07.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68221966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68221966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-add168de6350469ed362b379852098700cbcc91e862c817655a8ccf6ae2fca363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4A4R84pZgO41_uJWKP6lSL8A1cmynuHLsEDuHvAcPTFPKaaXZb2ZHC8ANRjlGmN7v89RL5WxOEKI5YjnC-AzMMVnSjHGCZuAyxj1CmGHBLsAMUyFYKco5-PmUzmqZbPAwNFD6ZOugRxhVb4y3fgfrEVqvbW9UOq53LtTOephMnAQNV49bWLsQNExjd3I01h0aHVMnpLWqD52TyRxs6svb78HEByhjNDG2xqfpdh_qISZ_UK7AeSNdNNenuQAfz0_v69dss315W682WYcLkTKpNaZcG1qUaEmF0QUldcEELwkSnCGkaqUENpwSxTGjZSm5Ug2VhjRKFrRYgLu_3K4PU6NUtTYq45z0JgyxopwQLOgE3p7AoW6NrrretrIfq_8_Fr_WI3jK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68221966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of antibody screening by indirect antigloblin test and ABO blood typing by filtration and microplate techniques: assessment of robustness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mannessier, L ; Delamaire, M ; Bouix, O ; Krause, C ; Roubinet, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Mannessier, L ; Delamaire, M ; Bouix, O ; Krause, C ; Roubinet, F</creatorcontrib><description>According to requirements of the French Committee for Accreditation (Cofrac), it is essential to use validated and standardised methods in Immunohematology. This imposes first the knowledge of metrological tolerances for all the technics. Two multicenter studies were carried out to define the maximal acceptable deviations concerning incubation temperature and time, volumes of patient plasma and tests cells for antibody screening using indirect antiglobulin test on one hand and for reverse grouping on another hand. All equipment used (temperature test chamber, chronometer, pipettes) were calibrated according to Cofrac standards. The antibody screenings were performed manually using 3 different filtration systems: ID Diamed, Biovue Ortho and Scangel Biorad, the same tests cells, a standard 20 ng/mL anti RH1, a positive control anti KEL1 and a negative control; the reverse blood grouping was performed manually using the above mentionned filtration systems and microplate technic with the same A1 and B test cells. These two studies showed that all the tests from the multiples combinations of the above parameters gave the same results and allowed us to define a range of tolerance for 4 critical physical parameters involved in the antibody screening and blood typing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1246-7820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tracli.2006.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16997595</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>ABO Blood-Group System ; Accreditation ; Antibodies - blood ; Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods ; Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards ; Calibration ; France ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine, 2006-10, Vol.13 (4), p.271-277</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16997595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mannessier, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delamaire, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouix, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roubinet, F</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of antibody screening by indirect antigloblin test and ABO blood typing by filtration and microplate techniques: assessment of robustness</title><title>Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine</title><addtitle>Transfus Clin Biol</addtitle><description>According to requirements of the French Committee for Accreditation (Cofrac), it is essential to use validated and standardised methods in Immunohematology. This imposes first the knowledge of metrological tolerances for all the technics. Two multicenter studies were carried out to define the maximal acceptable deviations concerning incubation temperature and time, volumes of patient plasma and tests cells for antibody screening using indirect antiglobulin test on one hand and for reverse grouping on another hand. All equipment used (temperature test chamber, chronometer, pipettes) were calibrated according to Cofrac standards. The antibody screenings were performed manually using 3 different filtration systems: ID Diamed, Biovue Ortho and Scangel Biorad, the same tests cells, a standard 20 ng/mL anti RH1, a positive control anti KEL1 and a negative control; the reverse blood grouping was performed manually using the above mentionned filtration systems and microplate technic with the same A1 and B test cells. These two studies showed that all the tests from the multiples combinations of the above parameters gave the same results and allowed us to define a range of tolerance for 4 critical physical parameters involved in the antibody screening and blood typing.</description><subject>ABO Blood-Group System</subject><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods</subject><subject>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1246-7820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhH0A0VJ4A4R84pZgO41_uJWKP6lSL8A1cmynuHLsEDuHvAcPTFPKaaXZb2ZHC8ANRjlGmN7v89RL5WxOEKI5YjnC-AzMMVnSjHGCZuAyxj1CmGHBLsAMUyFYKco5-PmUzmqZbPAwNFD6ZOugRxhVb4y3fgfrEVqvbW9UOq53LtTOephMnAQNV49bWLsQNExjd3I01h0aHVMnpLWqD52TyRxs6svb78HEByhjNDG2xqfpdh_qISZ_UK7AeSNdNNenuQAfz0_v69dss315W682WYcLkTKpNaZcG1qUaEmF0QUldcEELwkSnCGkaqUENpwSxTGjZSm5Ug2VhjRKFrRYgLu_3K4PU6NUtTYq45z0JgyxopwQLOgE3p7AoW6NrrretrIfq_8_Fr_WI3jK</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Mannessier, L</creator><creator>Delamaire, M</creator><creator>Bouix, O</creator><creator>Krause, C</creator><creator>Roubinet, F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Validation of antibody screening by indirect antigloblin test and ABO blood typing by filtration and microplate techniques: assessment of robustness</title><author>Mannessier, L ; Delamaire, M ; Bouix, O ; Krause, C ; Roubinet, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-add168de6350469ed362b379852098700cbcc91e862c817655a8ccf6ae2fca363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>ABO Blood-Group System</topic><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods</topic><topic>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mannessier, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delamaire, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouix, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roubinet, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mannessier, L</au><au>Delamaire, M</au><au>Bouix, O</au><au>Krause, C</au><au>Roubinet, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of antibody screening by indirect antigloblin test and ABO blood typing by filtration and microplate techniques: assessment of robustness</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Clin Biol</addtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>271-277</pages><issn>1246-7820</issn><abstract>According to requirements of the French Committee for Accreditation (Cofrac), it is essential to use validated and standardised methods in Immunohematology. This imposes first the knowledge of metrological tolerances for all the technics. Two multicenter studies were carried out to define the maximal acceptable deviations concerning incubation temperature and time, volumes of patient plasma and tests cells for antibody screening using indirect antiglobulin test on one hand and for reverse grouping on another hand. All equipment used (temperature test chamber, chronometer, pipettes) were calibrated according to Cofrac standards. The antibody screenings were performed manually using 3 different filtration systems: ID Diamed, Biovue Ortho and Scangel Biorad, the same tests cells, a standard 20 ng/mL anti RH1, a positive control anti KEL1 and a negative control; the reverse blood grouping was performed manually using the above mentionned filtration systems and microplate technic with the same A1 and B test cells. These two studies showed that all the tests from the multiples combinations of the above parameters gave the same results and allowed us to define a range of tolerance for 4 critical physical parameters involved in the antibody screening and blood typing.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>16997595</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tracli.2006.07.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1246-7820
ispartof Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine, 2006-10, Vol.13 (4), p.271-277
issn 1246-7820
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68221966
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects ABO Blood-Group System
Accreditation
Antibodies - blood
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards
Calibration
France
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Validation of antibody screening by indirect antigloblin test and ABO blood typing by filtration and microplate techniques: assessment of robustness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A56%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20antibody%20screening%20by%20indirect%20antigloblin%20test%20and%20ABO%20blood%20typing%20by%20filtration%20and%20microplate%20techniques:%20assessment%20of%20robustness&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20clinique%20et%20biologique%20:%20journal%20de%20la%20Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20fran%C3%A7aise%20de%20transfusion%20sanguine&rft.au=Mannessier,%20L&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=271-277&rft.issn=1246-7820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tracli.2006.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68221966%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68221966&rft_id=info:pmid/16997595&rfr_iscdi=true