Defining Acute Renal Failure: The RIFLE Criteria

Acute renal failure is common among critically ill patients and carries significant morbidity and mortality. The reported incidence and the attributed morbidity and mortality of acute renal failure vary widely, largely owing to the use of a wide variety of definitions for acute renal failure. Until...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intensive care medicine 2007-07, Vol.22 (4), p.187-193
Hauptverfasser: Venkataraman, Ramesh, Kellum, John A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Acute renal failure is common among critically ill patients and carries significant morbidity and mortality. The reported incidence and the attributed morbidity and mortality of acute renal failure vary widely, largely owing to the use of a wide variety of definitions for acute renal failure. Until recently, no consensus existed about how to best define, characterize, and study acute renal failure. This lack of a standard definition has been a major impediment to the progress of clinical and basic research in this field. This review outlines some of the physiologic principles that may help us better understand and define acute renal failure and describes the RIFLE criteria (an acronym comprising Risk, Injury, and Failure; and Loss, and End-stage kidney disease), a recent consensus method of defining and stratifying acute renal failure. Also discussed are many of the challenges and controversies associated with achieving consensus and developing a classification for acute renal dysfunction.
ISSN:0885-0666
1525-1489
DOI:10.1177/0885066607299510