CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration by an easy‐to‐use single platform image cytometer for HIV monitoring in resource‐constrained settings
Background: HIV monitoring in resource‐constrained settings demands affordable and reliable CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration methods. We developed a simple single platform image cytometer (SP ICM), which is a dedicated volumetric CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration system that uses immunomagnetic and immun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Clinical cytometry, 2007-09, Vol.72B (5), p.397-407 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
HIV monitoring in resource‐constrained settings demands affordable and reliable CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration methods. We developed a simple single platform image cytometer (SP ICM), which is a dedicated volumetric CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration system that uses immunomagnetic and immunofluorescent technologies. The instrument was designed to be a low‐cost, yet reliable and robust one. In this article we test the instrument and the immunochemical procedures used on blood from HIV negative and HIV positive patients.
Methods:
After CD4 immunomagnetic labeling in whole blood, CD4+ T lymphocytes, CD4+dim monocytes and some nonspecifically labeled cells are magnetically attracted to an analysis surface. Combining with CD3‐Phycoerythrin (PE) labeling, only CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes are fluorescently labeled and visible in a fluorescent image of the analysis surface. The number of CD4+ T lymphocytes is obtained by image analysis. Alternatively, CD3 immunomagnetic selection in combination with CD4 immunofluorescent labeling can also be applied for CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration.
Results:
The SP ICM system was compared with two single platform flow cytometer (SP FCM) methods: tetraCXP and TruCount methods. The SP ICM system has excellent precision, accuracy and linearity for CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration. Good correlations were obtained between the SP ICM and the SP FCM methods for blood specimens of 44 HIV− patients, and of 63 HIV+ patients. Bland–Altman plots showed interchangeability between the SP ICM and the SP FCM methods.
Conclusions:
The immunolabeling methods and the instrumentation are simple and easy‐to‐handle for less‐trained operators. The SP ICM system is a good candidate for CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration in point‐of‐care settings of resource‐constrained countries. © 2007 Clinical Cytometry Society. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1552-4949 1552-4957 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cyto.b.20165 |