Outcome of Liver Transplantation in Septuagenarians: A Single-Center Experience
HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that selected septuagenarians may do as well after transplantation as those of a younger group of older recipients. This work compares post–liver transplant survival in septuagenarians with that of patients aged 50 to 59 years. DESIGN Review of a prospectively maintained d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2007-08, Vol.142 (8), p.775-784 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that selected septuagenarians may do as well after transplantation as those of a younger group of older recipients. This work compares post–liver transplant survival in septuagenarians with that of patients aged 50 to 59 years. DESIGN Review of a prospectively maintained database. SETTING University transplant center. PATIENTS First-time liver transplant recipients treated from January 1, 1988, to December 31, 2005. Group 1 consisted of liver transplant recipients aged 70 years or older at the time of transplant. Group 2 was a younger cohort of patients aged 50 to 59 years. INTERVENTIONS Liver transplantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient survival. Survival data were stratified, Kaplan-Meier survival was calculated, and a multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS Group 1 included 62 patients aged 70 years or older (average, 71.9 ± 2.1 years). Group 2 included 864 patients aged 50 to 59 years (average, 54.3 ± 2.9 years). Unadjusted patient survival of group 1 at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 73.3%, 65.8%, 47.1%, and 39.7%, respectively. Unadjusted patient survival of group 2 at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 79.4%, 71.5%, 65.3%, and 45.2%, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .14). Multivariate analysis for factors affecting survival demonstrated preoperative hospitalization, cold ischemia time, and hepatitis C/ethanol as risk factors for death. Age 70 years or more was not a strong risk factor (mortality ratio, 1.28; P = .27). CONCLUSIONS When other risk factors for mortality are controlled in older recipients, risk of death due to age is reduced in well-selected recipients. Age by itself should not be used to limit liver transplantation.Arch Surg. 2007;142(8):775-784--> |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-0010 1538-3644 |
DOI: | 10.1001/archsurg.142.8.775 |