LyM: A Tool to Reach the Best Factor in Gene Expression Comparison
We developed a Perl-based tool called LyM to determine the best factor for changes in the expression level for each transcript across two sets of expression libraries. LyM includes a Bayesian framework that analyzes the prior and posterior probability density function for each transcript considering...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | In silico biology 2007, Vol.7 (1), p.101-104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We developed a Perl-based tool called LyM to determine the best
factor for changes in the expression level for each transcript across two sets
of expression libraries. LyM includes a Bayesian framework that analyzes the
prior and posterior probability density function for each
transcript considering the size of the libraries. To find out the best factor
for change in each distribution, LyM was implemented with a binary search. In
this work we aimed to validate the performance of LyM tool using SAGE libraries
from different human tissues. The results were compared with those generated by
DGED (Digital Gene Expression Displayer), which worked as the gold standard, on
the same data set, to assess accuracy. SAGE libraries were selected from CGAP
for the following tissues (normal versus tumor): breast, colon, lung and
stomach, consisting of eight SAGE libraries and 381,569 tags. DGED analyses
were performed with five arbitrary factors for gene expression in two
expression libraries: 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32. The results were confronted using the
ratio between LyM and DGED factors and were quantitatively well-matched. LyM
was capable of retrieving the best value of F, a factor that
represents the fold difference in the expression of a specific gene between two
expression libraries, represented by its SAGE tags. However, the optimal value
of F is only shown in DGED output after multiple manual
interactions. As a result, there was a significant economy of time with the LyM
binary search algorithm. In some anecdotal cases we observed that the
differential expression levels reached values above 100-fold for a fixed value
of P=0.05, an information that initially remained hidden in
DGED. Finally, LyM proved to be relatively fast, portable to the standard
workstation present in the molecular biology laboratory, assisting accurate and
convenient gene search in expression experiments with minimal user
interactions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1386-6338 1434-3207 |
DOI: | 10.3233/ISB-00279 |