Sirolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for patients with long coronary artery disease

Outcomes remain relatively unfavorable for stent-based coronary intervention of lesions with long diseased segments. This study compared sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for long coronary lesions. The present randomized, multicenter, prospective study compared the u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2006-11, Vol.114 (20), p.2148-2153
Hauptverfasser: KIM, Young-Hak, PARK, Seong-Wook, LEE, Jae-Hwan, SI WAN CHOI, SEONG, In-Whan, YOON HAENG CHO, LEE, Nae-Hee, JUNE HONG KIM, CHUN, Kook-Jin, PARK, Seung-Jung, LEE, Seung-Whan, PARK, Duk-Woo, YUN, Sung-Cheol, CHEOL WHAN LEE, HONG, Myeong-Ki, KIM, Hyun-Sook, KO, Jae-Ki, PARK, Jae-Hyeong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Outcomes remain relatively unfavorable for stent-based coronary intervention of lesions with long diseased segments. This study compared sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for long coronary lesions. The present randomized, multicenter, prospective study compared the use of long (> or =32 mm) SES with PES in 500 patients with long (> or =25 mm) native coronary lesions. The primary end point of the trial was the rate of binary in-segment restenosis according to follow-up angiography at 6 months. The SES and PES groups had similar baseline characteristics. Lesion length was 33.9+/-11.6 mm in the SES group and 34.5+/-12.6 mm in the PES group (P=0.527). The in-segment binary restenosis rate was significantly lower in the SES group than in the PES group (3.3% versus 14.6%; relative risk 0.23; P
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666396