Arthroscopic Bursectomy for Recalcitrant Trochanteric Bursitis

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the arthroscopic treatment of trochanteric bursitis in patients who have not responded to nonoperative treatment. Methods: Thirty patients were enrolled in this study to evaluate the results of arthroscopic bursectomy. Outcomes were asse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2007-08, Vol.23 (8), p.827-832
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Champ L., M.D, Massie, R. Vaughan, M.D, Hurt, W. Grear, M.D, Savory, Carlton G., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the arthroscopic treatment of trochanteric bursitis in patients who have not responded to nonoperative treatment. Methods: Thirty patients were enrolled in this study to evaluate the results of arthroscopic bursectomy. Outcomes were assessed by use of a visual analog pain scale, Harris Hip Score, Short Form 36 Health Survey, and additional specific hip function questions. Patients were given the self-administered outcome questionnaires before surgery and at subsequent follow-up visits. Of the patients, 25 were available for a mean follow-up of 26.1 months (range, 13.8 to 41 months). Results: Pain scores on the visual analog scale improved from a preoperative mean of 7.2 (0, no pain; 10, worst pain) to a postoperative mean of 3.1 at final follow-up ( P = .0001). Mean Harris Hip Scores improved from a mean of 51 preoperatively to 77 at follow-up ( P = .0001). Improvements were also noted in the physical component summary scores of the Short Form 36. The mean physical function score improved from 33.6 preoperatively to 54 at follow-up ( P = .022), and in the pain category, the mean score improved from 28.7 to 51.5 ( P = .001). One postoperative complication occurred, a seroma that required repeat surgery. One patient had a failed arthroscopic bursectomy and subsequently underwent open bursectomy with resolution of symptoms. Conclusions: Arthroscopic bursectomy appears to be an effective option for recalcitrant trochanteric bursitis and is a viable alternative to open bursectomy. In this prospective study patients had good pain relief and improved function compared with their preoperative status. Improvements in a patient’s status are usually evident by 1 to 3 months after surgery and appear to be lasting. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
ISSN:0749-8063
1526-3231
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.015