Postpartum neurologic symptoms following single-shot spinal block for labour analgesia

Background: As part of a quality assurance program, we investigated the incidence of postpartum neurologic symptoms in multiparous parturients receiving spinal block for labour analgesia, now in routine use in our labour ward. Methods: Two hundred and twenty‐nine consecutive multiparous parturients presenting for vaginal delivery and requesting spinal analgesia were asked to participate in this prospective study. All parturients received our standard intrathecal analgesia (ITA): 2.5 mg bupivacaine (1 ml) + 25 µg fentanyl (0.5 ml) using a 27‐gauge Quincke‐type needle. The patients filled in a questionnaire on the first day after delivery and again upon discharge. Complaints typical of neurologic sequelae were noted and a neurologic examination was performed, if necessary. All patients with postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and transient neurologic symptoms (TNSs) were interviewed by telephone 2 weeks after discharge to determine the course of the symptoms. Results: Two hundred and twelve parturients were included in the study. Eighteen (8.5%) parturients complained of PDPH, the severity of which was mild in eight (4%), moderate in seven (3%), and severe in three (1%) patients, respectively. Fifteen (7%) mothers were treated with analgesics or bedrest only. Three (1%) patients were given an epidural blood patch. The paramedian approach was associated with the development of PDPH (P = 0.04). Transient neurologic symptoms were experienced by nine (4.2%) mothers, lasting 1–3 days, mostly presenting as bilateral pain in the buttocks or thighs. One parturient suffered from paraesthesia of the left foot lasting for 3 days. Forty (19%) mothers complained of non‐postural headache and 28 (13%) of new‐onset backpain. Three mothers (1%) would not want to receive a further spinal block. Conclusion: Transient neurologic symptoms (TNSs) after spinal block occurred infrequently. The incidence of PDPH was higher than in the obstetric population in general and calls for re‐evaluation of our spinal block methods. Despite the occurrence of neurologic sequelae, patient acceptability was high.