Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients
To test the hypothesis that self-reported physical functioning is more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning. 163 knee-osteoarthritis patients completed the performance-based DynaPort ® KneeTest (DPKT), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC),...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2006-07, Vol.59 (7), p.724-731 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To test the hypothesis that self-reported physical functioning is more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning.
163 knee-osteoarthritis patients completed the performance-based DynaPort
® KneeTest (DPKT), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and SF-36 (self-report measures of pain and physical functioning) before, 3, 6, and 12 months after knee replacement.
Correlations between (two) self-reported measures of functioning and (two) pain measures were higher (0.57–0.74) than correlations between the performance-based measure of functioning and the two pain measures (0.20 and 0.26). In factor analysis, WOMAC and SF-36 pain and physical functioning subscores loaded on the first factor (eigenvalue 3.2), while DPKT KneeScore2 loaded on the second factor (eigenvalue 0.92). Before surgery, correlations between performance-based and self-reported physical functioning were higher in patients with less pain (0.43) compared to patients with more pain (0.17), for the WOMAC (as expected), but not for the SF-36. After surgery, when the pain had diminished, the correlations between performance-based and self-reported physical functioning were higher, especially for the WOMAC.
Our hypothesis was convincingly supported by the results of the WOMAC, and somewhat less by the results of the SF-36. We consider this as evidence for a lack of content validity of the WOMAC. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.019 |