Pregnancy outcome for Rh-alloimmunized women

Objective: To compare perinatal results of Rh-alloimmunized pregnancies managed with spectrophotometric amniotic fluid analysis or fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler ultrasonographic velocimetry. Method: A descriptive observational study involving 291 consecutive Rh-negative pregnancies. Group 1 c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2005-08, Vol.90 (2), p.103-106
Hauptverfasser: Nardozza, L.M.M., Camano, L., Moron, A.F., da Silva Pares, D.B., Chinen, P.A., Torloni, M.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To compare perinatal results of Rh-alloimmunized pregnancies managed with spectrophotometric amniotic fluid analysis or fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler ultrasonographic velocimetry. Method: A descriptive observational study involving 291 consecutive Rh-negative pregnancies. Group 1 consisted of 74 isoimmunized women managed with amniotic fluid spectrophotometry; group 2 of 25 isoimmunized women managed with Doppler ultrasonography; and group 3 of 192 nonimmunized Rh-negative women. The variables analyzed were need for intrauterine or neonatal transfusion, mode and time of delivery, birth weight, neonatal hematocrit, and perinatal mortality. Results: Need for intrauterine transfusion, birth weight, prematurity, rate of cesarean section, and perinatal mortality were similar in groups 1 and 2. Neonatal hematocrit was significantly lower and the need for neonatal transfusion was significantly higher when spectrophotometry rather than Doppler ultrasonographic velocimetry was used. Conclusion: Fetuses managed with Doppler ultrasonographic velocimetry had a higher hematocrit at birth and a lesser need for neonatal transfusion, suggesting that this noninvasive method of monitoring fetal anemia is a better choice.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.04.007