Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

In many countries, drug-eluting stent implantation is the dominant interventional strategy. We evaluated the clinical, angiographic, procedural, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. SES implantation was successful...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2006-06, Vol.27 (11), p.1305-1310
Hauptverfasser: HONG, Myeong-Ki, MINTZ, Gary S, PARK, Seong-Wook, PARK, Seung-Jung, CHEOL WHAN LEE, PARK, Duk-Woo, CHOI, Bong-Ryong, PARK, Kyoung-Ha, KIM, Young-Hak, CHEONG, Sang-Sig, SONG, Jae-Kwan, KIM, Jae-Joong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In many countries, drug-eluting stent implantation is the dominant interventional strategy. We evaluated the clinical, angiographic, procedural, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. SES implantation was successfully performed in 550 patients with 670 native coronary lesions. Six-month follow-up angiography was performed in 449 patients (81.6%) with 543 lesions (81.1%). Clinical, angiographic, procedural, and IVUS predictors of restenosis were determined. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, the only independent predictors of angiographic restenosis were post-procedural final minimum stent area by IVUS [odds ratio (OR)=0.586, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.387-0.888, P=0.012] and IVUS-measured stent length (OR=1.029, 95% CI 1.002-1.056, P=0.035). Final minimum stent area by IVUS and IVUS-measured stent length that best separated restenosis from non-restenosis were 5.5 mm2 and 40 mm, respectively. Lesions with final minimum stent area40 mm had the highest rate of angiographic restenosis [17.7% (11/62)], P
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi882