Workplace discrimination, deafness and hearing impairment: The national EEOC ADA research project
Data compiled by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), in its Integrated Mission System, provide documentation regarding the employment discrimination experience of Americans who are deaf or hard of hearing. This paper presents an analysis of 8,936 allegations filed by persons with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2005, Vol.25 (1), p.19-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Data compiled by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC), in its Integrated Mission System, provide documentation regarding the
employment discrimination experience of Americans who are deaf or hard of
hearing. This paper presents an analysis of 8,936 allegations filed by persons
with hearing impairment and closed by EEOC between July 26, 1992 and September
30, 2003, as compared to 165,674 allegations filed by individuals with other
physical or sensory disabilities. The investigators compare and contrast
demographic characteristics of Charging Parties, characteristics of
Respondents, the nature of allegations, and the outcomes of the allegations in
order to illustrate how these variables differ between the two groups, herein
referred to as HEARING (deaf, hard of hearing, or other hearing impairment) and
GENDIS (general disability). Most allegations derived from both groups were
filed against larger Respondents (those with 500+ workers). The most common
allegation issues in the HEARING group involved matters of discharge,
reasonable accommodation, and hiring. Outcomes derived from HEARING allegations
were more likely to result in merit resolutions when compared to GENDIS, by a
25% to 21% margin. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1051-9815 1875-9270 |
DOI: | 10.3233/WOR-2005-00478 |