Development and Evaluation of Home-Based Speed-of-Processing Training for Older Adults
Wadley VG, Benz RL, Ball KK, Roenker DL, Edwards JD, Vance DE. Development and evaluation of home-based speed-of-processing training for older adults. To develop technical parameters for a videotape-based speed-of-processing training protocol, to evaluate the feasibility of self-administration (expe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2006-06, Vol.87 (6), p.757-763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Wadley VG, Benz RL, Ball KK, Roenker DL, Edwards JD, Vance DE. Development and evaluation of home-based speed-of-processing training for older adults.
To develop technical parameters for a videotape-based speed-of-processing training protocol, to evaluate the feasibility of self-administration (experiment 1), and to evaluate the protocol’s effectiveness (experiment 2).
A feasibility study (experiment 1) and a pre-post, 4-arm, nonrandomized controlled trial (experiment 2).
University research center.
A population-based sample (37 men, 47 women; age range, 65−94y) (experiment 1). A population-based sample (age ≥65y) with no prior exposure to the Useful Field of View assessment or speed-of-processing training, no dementia or life-limiting illness, a Mini-Mental State Examination score of greater than 24, corrected far visual acuity of greater than or equal to 20/40, contrast sensitivity of greater than or equal to 1.50 log
10, and deficient processing speed (experiment 2). For experiment 2, 8 of 189 eligible people declined to participate. The final sample for this experiment included 100 men and 81 women (age range, 65−91y).
Eight to ten 1-hour cognitive training sessions.
Posttraining gains in processing speed.
Self-administration was feasible. Subjects who underwent home-based training improved their processing speed significantly more than either control group (F
3,146=16.16,
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.027 |