Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study

Objective Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus. Interventions Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2005-07, Vol.42 (4), p.439-441
Hauptverfasser: de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga, Pedro, Patrícia Franco, Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela, Pereira, Tatiana, de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes, Aiello, Carlos Alberto, Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 441
container_issue 4
container_start_page 439
container_title The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal
container_volume 42
creator de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga
Pedro, Patrícia Franco
Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela
Pereira, Tatiana
de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes
Aiello, Carlos Alberto
Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato
description Objective Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus. Interventions Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically. Results No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups. Conclusion The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1597/04-052r.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68011701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1597_04-052r.1</sage_id><sourcerecordid>874528811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkFFrFDEUhYMotlYf_AMSBAUfpuZmksymb2WtWih0YYuvITNzU1KykzWZVPbfN0sXWuxTDuS75557CPkI7BSk7r4z0TDJ0ym8IscghWxAKv26aiZlo5RUR-RdzneMcQl88ZYcgWIMNO-OSVjGzdYmO_t7pBf3NpQq40Sjozf_Iv3hncOE00z_YJ59X0LcBpvnHV2XdOsHG-gqxQHHkjBTP9FlQDfTVTWpQ_mMntOVD3Gm67mMu_fkjbMh44fDe0LWPy9ulr-bq-tfl8vzq2YQAHOjULtWC6ZBOc3HKh3HQS40d25Udmg1jr3i_dhzC6x-qFH0TGnoRIe6PSFfH123Kf4tNbbZ-DxgCHbCWLJRCwbQMajg5__Au1jSVJMZzoRuheSLCn17hIYUc07ozDb5jU07A8zs2zdMmH37Zm_46WBY-g2OT-Sh7gp8OQA21-5cstPg8zNOK9GqZydke4tPqV5ufABIG5h7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204934528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga ; Pedro, Patrícia Franco ; Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela ; Pereira, Tatiana ; de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes ; Aiello, Carlos Alberto ; Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creator><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga ; Pedro, Patrícia Franco ; Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela ; Pereira, Tatiana ; de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes ; Aiello, Carlos Alberto ; Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus. Interventions Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically. Results No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups. Conclusion The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-6656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1597/04-052r.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16001927</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPJOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Alveolar Process - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Transplantation ; Child ; Cleft Lip - rehabilitation ; Cleft Lip - surgery ; Cleft Palate - rehabilitation ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Pilot Projects ; Postoperative Period ; Splints ; Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation ; Vestibuloplasty - methods</subject><ispartof>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-07, Vol.42 (4), p.439-441</ispartof><rights>The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press, Inc. Jul 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1597/04-052r.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1597/04-052r.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16964369$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16001927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</title><title>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</title><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><description>Objective Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus. Interventions Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically. Results No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups. Conclusion The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Splints</subject><subject>Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vestibuloplasty - methods</subject><issn>1055-6656</issn><issn>1545-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkFFrFDEUhYMotlYf_AMSBAUfpuZmksymb2WtWih0YYuvITNzU1KykzWZVPbfN0sXWuxTDuS75557CPkI7BSk7r4z0TDJ0ym8IscghWxAKv26aiZlo5RUR-RdzneMcQl88ZYcgWIMNO-OSVjGzdYmO_t7pBf3NpQq40Sjozf_Iv3hncOE00z_YJ59X0LcBpvnHV2XdOsHG-gqxQHHkjBTP9FlQDfTVTWpQ_mMntOVD3Gm67mMu_fkjbMh44fDe0LWPy9ulr-bq-tfl8vzq2YQAHOjULtWC6ZBOc3HKh3HQS40d25Udmg1jr3i_dhzC6x-qFH0TGnoRIe6PSFfH123Kf4tNbbZ-DxgCHbCWLJRCwbQMajg5__Au1jSVJMZzoRuheSLCn17hIYUc07ozDb5jU07A8zs2zdMmH37Zm_46WBY-g2OT-Sh7gp8OQA21-5cstPg8zNOK9GqZydke4tPqV5ufABIG5h7</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</creator><creator>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</creator><creator>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</creator><creator>Pereira, Tatiana</creator><creator>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</creator><creator>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</creator><creator>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</title><author>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga ; Pedro, Patrícia Franco ; Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela ; Pereira, Tatiana ; de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes ; Aiello, Carlos Alberto ; Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Splints</topic><topic>Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vestibuloplasty - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</au><au>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</au><au>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</au><au>Pereira, Tatiana</au><au>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</au><au>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</au><au>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>439-441</pages><issn>1055-6656</issn><eissn>1545-1569</eissn><coden>CPJOEG</coden><abstract>Objective Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus. Interventions Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically. Results No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups. Conclusion The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16001927</pmid><doi>10.1597/04-052r.1</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-6656
ispartof The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-07, Vol.42 (4), p.439-441
issn 1055-6656
1545-1569
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68011701
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Adolescent
Alveolar Process - surgery
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Transplantation
Child
Cleft Lip - rehabilitation
Cleft Lip - surgery
Cleft Palate - rehabilitation
Cleft Palate - surgery
Dentistry
Humans
Medical sciences
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Pilot Projects
Postoperative Period
Splints
Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation
Vestibuloplasty - methods
title Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T01%3A30%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Two%20Different%20Vestibuloplasty%20Surgical%20Procedures%20in%20Cleft%20Patients:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Cleft%20palate-craniofacial%20journal&rft.au=de%20Almeida,%20Ana%20L%C3%BAcia%20Pomp%C3%A9ia%20Fraga&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=439-441&rft.issn=1055-6656&rft.eissn=1545-1569&rft.coden=CPJOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1597/04-052r.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874528811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204934528&rft_id=info:pmid/16001927&rft_sage_id=10.1597_04-052r.1&rfr_iscdi=true