Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study
Objective Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus. Interventions Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2005-07, Vol.42 (4), p.439-441 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 441 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 439 |
container_title | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga Pedro, Patrícia Franco Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela Pereira, Tatiana de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes Aiello, Carlos Alberto Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato |
description | Objective
Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus.
Interventions
Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically.
Results
No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups.
Conclusion
The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1597/04-052r.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68011701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1597_04-052r.1</sage_id><sourcerecordid>874528811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkFFrFDEUhYMotlYf_AMSBAUfpuZmksymb2WtWih0YYuvITNzU1KykzWZVPbfN0sXWuxTDuS75557CPkI7BSk7r4z0TDJ0ym8IscghWxAKv26aiZlo5RUR-RdzneMcQl88ZYcgWIMNO-OSVjGzdYmO_t7pBf3NpQq40Sjozf_Iv3hncOE00z_YJ59X0LcBpvnHV2XdOsHG-gqxQHHkjBTP9FlQDfTVTWpQ_mMntOVD3Gm67mMu_fkjbMh44fDe0LWPy9ulr-bq-tfl8vzq2YQAHOjULtWC6ZBOc3HKh3HQS40d25Udmg1jr3i_dhzC6x-qFH0TGnoRIe6PSFfH123Kf4tNbbZ-DxgCHbCWLJRCwbQMajg5__Au1jSVJMZzoRuheSLCn17hIYUc07ozDb5jU07A8zs2zdMmH37Zm_46WBY-g2OT-Sh7gp8OQA21-5cstPg8zNOK9GqZydke4tPqV5ufABIG5h7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204934528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga ; Pedro, Patrícia Franco ; Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela ; Pereira, Tatiana ; de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes ; Aiello, Carlos Alberto ; Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creator><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga ; Pedro, Patrícia Franco ; Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela ; Pereira, Tatiana ; de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes ; Aiello, Carlos Alberto ; Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus.
Interventions
Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically.
Results
No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups.
Conclusion
The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-6656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1597/04-052r.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16001927</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPJOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Alveolar Process - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Transplantation ; Child ; Cleft Lip - rehabilitation ; Cleft Lip - surgery ; Cleft Palate - rehabilitation ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Pilot Projects ; Postoperative Period ; Splints ; Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation ; Vestibuloplasty - methods</subject><ispartof>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-07, Vol.42 (4), p.439-441</ispartof><rights>The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press, Inc. Jul 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1597/04-052r.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1597/04-052r.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16964369$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16001927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</title><title>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</title><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><description>Objective
Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus.
Interventions
Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically.
Results
No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups.
Conclusion
The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Splints</subject><subject>Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vestibuloplasty - methods</subject><issn>1055-6656</issn><issn>1545-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkFFrFDEUhYMotlYf_AMSBAUfpuZmksymb2WtWih0YYuvITNzU1KykzWZVPbfN0sXWuxTDuS75557CPkI7BSk7r4z0TDJ0ym8IscghWxAKv26aiZlo5RUR-RdzneMcQl88ZYcgWIMNO-OSVjGzdYmO_t7pBf3NpQq40Sjozf_Iv3hncOE00z_YJ59X0LcBpvnHV2XdOsHG-gqxQHHkjBTP9FlQDfTVTWpQ_mMntOVD3Gm67mMu_fkjbMh44fDe0LWPy9ulr-bq-tfl8vzq2YQAHOjULtWC6ZBOc3HKh3HQS40d25Udmg1jr3i_dhzC6x-qFH0TGnoRIe6PSFfH123Kf4tNbbZ-DxgCHbCWLJRCwbQMajg5__Au1jSVJMZzoRuheSLCn17hIYUc07ozDb5jU07A8zs2zdMmH37Zm_46WBY-g2OT-Sh7gp8OQA21-5cstPg8zNOK9GqZydke4tPqV5ufABIG5h7</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</creator><creator>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</creator><creator>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</creator><creator>Pereira, Tatiana</creator><creator>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</creator><creator>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</creator><creator>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</title><author>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga ; Pedro, Patrícia Franco ; Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela ; Pereira, Tatiana ; de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes ; Aiello, Carlos Alberto ; Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-6e9f3940916f92d394f2ec5892ffd6ac39edb62bdb2a10c586d4b0691747e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Splints</topic><topic>Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vestibuloplasty - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga</au><au>Pedro, Patrícia Franco</au><au>Kogawa, Evelyn Mikaela</au><au>Pereira, Tatiana</au><au>de Barros Carrilho, Guilherme Paes</au><au>Aiello, Carlos Alberto</au><au>Freitas, Patrícia Zambonato</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>439-441</pages><issn>1055-6656</issn><eissn>1545-1569</eissn><coden>CPJOEG</coden><abstract>Objective
Patients with a cleft lip or palate often present alterations in the labial aspect of the ridge, resulting in a shallow vestibule. This study compares the results of two different surgical procedures on deepening of the labial sulcus.
Interventions
Ten patients with a cleft lip and palate were separated into two groups and underwent different vestibuloplasty procedures. An experimental group used a removable retention splint. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative sulcus heights were measured and analyzed statistically.
Results
No statistically significant differences could be detected between groups.
Conclusion
The results indicated that to reach consistent results, a larger number of patients must be submitted to this evaluation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16001927</pmid><doi>10.1597/04-052r.1</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-6656 |
ispartof | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-07, Vol.42 (4), p.439-441 |
issn | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68011701 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Alveolar Process - surgery Biological and medical sciences Bone Transplantation Child Cleft Lip - rehabilitation Cleft Lip - surgery Cleft Palate - rehabilitation Cleft Palate - surgery Dentistry Humans Medical sciences Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Pilot Projects Postoperative Period Splints Vestibuloplasty - instrumentation Vestibuloplasty - methods |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Vestibuloplasty Surgical Procedures in Cleft Patients: A Pilot Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T01%3A30%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Two%20Different%20Vestibuloplasty%20Surgical%20Procedures%20in%20Cleft%20Patients:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Cleft%20palate-craniofacial%20journal&rft.au=de%20Almeida,%20Ana%20L%C3%BAcia%20Pomp%C3%A9ia%20Fraga&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=439-441&rft.issn=1055-6656&rft.eissn=1545-1569&rft.coden=CPJOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1597/04-052r.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874528811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204934528&rft_id=info:pmid/16001927&rft_sage_id=10.1597_04-052r.1&rfr_iscdi=true |