Microtensile Bond Strength of Luting Materials to Coronal and Root Dentin
ABSTRACT Purpose:: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of two dual‐cured resin cements and a glass ionomer cement to coronal dentin versus root dentin. Materials and Methods: RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc., To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2005-05, Vol.17 (3), p.165-171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT
Purpose::
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of two dual‐cured resin cements and a glass ionomer cement to coronal dentin versus root dentin.
Materials and Methods:
RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc., Tokyo, Japan) were the resin cements used and FujiCEM (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was the glass ionomer cement used. Once separated, the labial coronal and root surfaces of six bovine incisors were ground with 600‐grit SiC papers to expose middle dentin. Then, the dentin surfaces were treated following the manufacturers’instructions and a 1 mm thick layer of each material was applied to the flattened coronal and root surfaces. Each material was cured following the manufacturers’recommendations and a composite buildup was made over the cured luting materials for testing purposes. After 24 hours in water at 37°C, the teeth were sectioned into 1 mm × 1 mm × 6 mm beams and tested for μTBS. The data were analyzed by one‐ and two‐way analysis of variance and Fisher's Protected Least Squares Differences test (p < .05).
Results:
The μTBSs to coronal and root dentin were similar within each cement. Comparing the materials, RelyX Unicem presented the highest μTBS, followed by Panavia F and FujiCEM, respectively (p < .0001).
Conclusions: Although there were differences in μTBS among the materials tested, no significant differences were found between bond strengths to coronal and root substrates. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1496-4155 1708-8240 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00107.x |