Correction of phase offset errors in main pulmonary artery flow quantification

Purpose To investigate whether an existing method for correction of phase offset errors in phase‐contrast velocity quantification is applicable for assessment of main pulmonary artery flow with an MR scanner equipped with a high‐power gradient system. Materials and Methods The correction method cons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2005-07, Vol.22 (1), p.73-79
Hauptverfasser: Lankhaar, Jan-Willem, Hofman, Mark B.M., Marcus, J. Tim, Zwanenburg, Jaco J.M., Faes, Theo J.C., Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To investigate whether an existing method for correction of phase offset errors in phase‐contrast velocity quantification is applicable for assessment of main pulmonary artery flow with an MR scanner equipped with a high‐power gradient system. Materials and Methods The correction method consists of fitting a surface through the time average of stationary pixels of velocity‐encoded phase images, and subtracting this surface from the velocity images. Pixels are regarded as stationary if their time standard deviation falls into the lowest percentile. Flow was measured in the main pulmonary artery of 15 subjects. Each measurement was repeated on a stationary phantom. The phase offset error in the phantom was used as a reference. Correction was applied with varying polynomial surface orders (0–5) and stationarity percentiles (5–50%). The optimal surface order and stationarity percentile were determined by comparing the fitted surface with the phantom. Results Using a first‐order surface and a (noncritical) 25% percentile, the correction method significantly reduced the phase offset error from 1.1 to 0.35 cm/second (RMS), which is equivalent to a reduction from 11% to 3.3% of mean volume flow. Phase error correction strongly affected stroke volume (range –11 to 26%). Conclusion The method significantly reduces phase offset errors in pulmonary artery flow. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;22:73–79. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.20361