CpG Island M`ethylation Status in Gastric Carcinoma with and without Infection of Epstein-Barr Virus
Purpose: EBV-associated gastric carcinoma shows global CpG island methylation of the promoter region of various cancer-related genes. To further clarify the significance of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status in gastric carcinoma, we investigated methylation profile and clinicopathologic f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2006-05, Vol.12 (10), p.2995-3002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: EBV-associated gastric carcinoma shows global CpG island methylation of the promoter region of various cancer-related genes.
To further clarify the significance of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status in gastric carcinoma, we investigated
methylation profile and clinicopathologic features including overall survival in four subgroups defined by EBV infection and
CIMP status: EBV-associated gastric carcinoma and EBV-negative/CIMP-high (H), EBV-intermediate (I), and EBV-negative (N) gastric
carcinoma.
Experimental Design: Methylation-specific PCR was applied to 106 gastric carcinoma cases. CIMP-N, CIMP-I, and CIMP-H status was determined by
the number (0, 1-3, and 4-5, respectively) of methylated marker genes ( LOX, HRASLS, FLNc, HAND1 , and TM ), that were newly identified as highly methylated in gastric cancer cell lines. The methylation status of 10 other cancer-related
genes ( p14, p15, p16, p73, TIMP-3, E-cadherin, DAPK, GSTP1, hMLH1 , and MGMT ) was also evaluated.
Results: Nearly all (14 of 15) of EBV-associated gastric carcinoma exhibited CIMP-H, constituting a homogenous group (14%). EBV-negative
gastric carcinoma consisted of CIMP-H (24%), CIMP-I (38%), and CIMP-N (24%). EBV-associated gastric carcinoma showed significantly
higher frequencies of methylation of cancer-related genes (mean number ± SD = 6.9 ± 1.5) even if compared with EBV-negative/CIMP-H
gastric carcinoma (3.5 ± 1.8). Among EBV-negative gastric carcinoma subgroups, CIMP-H gastric carcinoma showed comparatively
higher frequency of methylation than CIMP-I or CIMP-N, especially of p16 and hMLH1 . CIMP-N gastric carcinoma predominantly consisted of advanced carcinoma with significantly higher frequency of lymph node
metastasis. The prognosis of the patients of CIMP-N was significantly worse compared with other groups overall by univariate
analysis ( P = 0.0313).
Conclusion: The methylation profile of five representative genes is useful to stratify gastric carcinomas into biologically different
subgroups. EBV-associated gastric carcinoma showed global CpG island methylation, comprising a pathogenetically distinct subgroup
in CIMP-H gastric carcinoma. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1601 |