Manual Therapy, Physical Therapy, or Continued Care by the General Practitioner for Patients With Neck Pain: Long-Term Results From a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVESThe authorsʼ goals were to compare the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT; mainly spinal mobilization), physical therapy (PT; mainly exercise therapy), and continued care by the general practitioner (GP; analgesics, counseling and education) over a period of 1 year. METHODSOne hundred eig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Clinical journal of pain 2006-05, Vol.22 (4), p.370-377
Hauptverfasser: Hoving, Jan L, de Vet, Henrica C. W, Koes, Bart W, Mameren, Henk van, Devillé, Walter L. J. M, van der Windt, Daniëlle A. W. M, Assendelft, Willem J. J, Pool, Jan J. M, Scholten, Rob J. P. M, Korthals–de Bos, Ingeborg B. C, Bouter, Lex M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVESThe authorsʼ goals were to compare the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT; mainly spinal mobilization), physical therapy (PT; mainly exercise therapy), and continued care by the general practitioner (GP; analgesics, counseling and education) over a period of 1 year. METHODSOne hundred eighty-three patients suffering for at least 2 weeks from nonspecific neck pain were randomized to receive a 6-week treatment strategy of MT once a week, PT twice a week, or GP care once every 2 weeks. The primary outcome measures were perceived recovery, severity of physical dysfunctioning, pain intensity, and functional disability. RESULTSThe differences between groups considered over 1 year were statistically significant (repeated measurements analyses P
ISSN:0749-8047
1536-5409
DOI:10.1097/01.ajp.0000180185.79382.3f