The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on left ventricular functional recovery early after acute myocardial infarction: a randomized experimental magnetic resonance imaging study

Aims We sought to determine whether intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation improves the recovery of left ventricular (LV) systolic function after reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and results Fourteen dogs underwent 90‐min coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2005-06, Vol.26 (12), p.1235-1241
Hauptverfasser: Azevedo, Clerio F., Amado, Luciano C., Kraitchman, Dara L., Gerber, Bernhard L., Edvardsen, Thor, Osman, Nael F., Rochitte, Carlos E., Wu, Katherine C., Lima, Joao A.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims We sought to determine whether intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation improves the recovery of left ventricular (LV) systolic function after reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and results Fourteen dogs underwent 90‐min coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion. Seven animals were randomized to IABP counterpulsation immediately after reperfusion. Tagged, cine, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were used for regional and global LV functional assessment and MI characterization, respectively. Image acquisition was performed at 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h after reperfusion, during which the IABP device was paused. Animals randomized to IABP demonstrated an earlier improvement of LV ejection fraction when compared with controls (25±3 vs. 25±2% at 1 h, P=0.91; 36±3 vs. 26±2% at 6 h, P=0.015; and 38±3 vs. 35±1% at 24 h, P=0.34). Regional functional analyses revealed the same behaviour among non-infarcted risk regions, i.e., earlier circumferential systolic strain improvement in the IABP group than in controls (−5.4±0.4 vs. −5.3±0.5% at 1 h, P=0.86; −12.1±1.0 vs. −6.0±0.4% at 6 h, P
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi137