Is Aneusomy of Chromosome 9 Alone a Valid Biomarker for Urinary Bladder Cancer Screening?
Background: Detection of genetically-changed tumor cells in the urine is one of the new approaches for the screening of bladder carcinomas. In a previous study, numerical aberrations of chromosome 9 were found in 85.18% of bladder tumors studied by the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anticancer research 2006-03, Vol.26 (2A), p.1161-1165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Detection of genetically-changed tumor cells in the urine is one of the new approaches for the screening of bladder
carcinomas. In a previous study, numerical aberrations of chromosome 9 were found in 85.18% of bladder tumors studied by the
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether chromosome
9 aneusomy alone is a valid, cost effective, biomarker for bladder cancer screening. Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven voided
urine specimens obtained from 22 bladder cancer patients, either at initial diagnosis or at the follow-up, were analyzed by
the FISH technique with the centromeric probe specific for chromosome 9. Results: In all except 2 out of the 13 specimens
with a histological confirmation of cancer, FISH analysis showed aneusomy 9 (sensitivity 84.61%). Among 6 cases with a negative
cystoscopy but a positive FISH analysis, 3 recurred within the following 2 months, while 2 no-recurrent patients continued
to show positive FISH findings after 6 months. One patient was considered to be false-positive. Four cases with a negative
cystoscopy showed disomy 9 and 2 of them recurred. Conclusion: Aneusomy 9 has a high sensitivity (84.61%) for the detection
of bladder cancer. Patients with a negative cystoscopy but with aneusomy 9 should be kept under close clinical surveillance
for potential disease recurrence. However, negative FISH results might not be a negative predictor for disease recurrence.
Our results encourage further studies with a large number of patients and a long-term follow-up with concurrent FISH analysis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0250-7005 1791-7530 |