Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: A comparative cohort study

This study was undertaken to compare laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies for efficacy and safety. Charts were reviewed for 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and 61 patients who underwent open sacral colpopexy. Demographic and hospital data, complications, and follow-up vis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2005-05, Vol.192 (5), p.1752-1758
Hauptverfasser: Paraiso, Marie Fidela R., Walters, Mark D., Rackley, Raymond R., Melek, Seham, Hugney, Cathy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study was undertaken to compare laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies for efficacy and safety. Charts were reviewed for 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and 61 patients who underwent open sacral colpopexy. Demographic and hospital data, complications, and follow-up visits were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 13.5 ± 12.1 months and 15.7 ± 18.1months in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. Mean operating time was significantly greater in the laparoscopic versus open cohort, 269 ± 65 minutes and 218 ± 60 minutes, respectively ( P < .0001). Estimated blood loss (172 ± 166 mL vs 234 ± 149 mL; P = .04) and hospital stay (1.8 ± 1.0 days vs 4.0 ± 1.8 days; P < .0001) were significantly less in the laparoscopic group than the open group. Complication and reoperation rates were similar. Laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies have comparable clinical outcomes. Although laparoscopic sacral colpopexy requires longer operating time, hospital stay is significantly decreased.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.051