Why Are You Bringing Up Condoms Now ? The Effect of Message Content on Framing Effects of Condom Use Messages
According to prospect theory ( A. Tversky & D. Kahneman, 1981 ), messages advocating a low-risk (i.e., easy, low-cost) behavior are most effective if they stress the benefits of adherence ( gain framed ), whereas messages advocating a risky behavior are most effective if they stress the costs of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health psychology 2005-05, Vol.24 (3), p.321-326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | According to prospect theory (
A. Tversky & D. Kahneman, 1981
), messages advocating a low-risk (i.e., easy, low-cost) behavior are most effective if they stress the benefits of adherence (
gain framed
), whereas messages advocating a risky behavior are most effective if they stress the costs of nonadherence (
loss framed
). Although condom use is viewed as a low-risk behavior, it may entail risky interpersonal negotiations. Study 1 (
N
= 167) compared ratings of condom use messages advocating relational behaviors (e.g., discussing condoms) or health behaviors (e.g., carrying condoms). As predicted, loss-framed relational messages and gain-framed health messages received higher evaluations. Study 2 (
N
= 225) offers a replication and evidence of issue involvement and gender as moderators. Results are discussed with reference to the design of condom use messages. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-6133 1930-7810 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.321 |