Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Associate Editor Michael G. Wyllie Editorial Board Ian Eardley, UK Jean Fourcroy, USA Sidney Glina, Brazil Julia Heiman, USA Chris McMahon, Australia Bob Millar, UK Alvaro Morales, Canada Michael Perelman, USA Marcel Waldinger, Netherlands OBJECTIVES To present a pilot study of laparoscopic unilater...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2005-06, Vol.95 (9), p.1267-1271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Associate Editor
Michael G. Wyllie
Editorial Board
Ian Eardley, UK
Jean Fourcroy, USA
Sidney Glina, Brazil
Julia Heiman, USA
Chris McMahon, Australia
Bob Millar, UK
Alvaro Morales, Canada
Michael Perelman, USA
Marcel Waldinger, Netherlands
OBJECTIVES
To present a pilot study of laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy, with the aim of preserving sexual potency.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Because they had localized prostate cancer, 29 men had a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with deliberate wide unilateral neurovascular bundle resection and preservation of the contralateral bundle. Fifteen men (group A) had an interposition sural nerve graft on the sectioned bundle, and 14 (group B) had laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the unilateral bundle only. The men were also involved in a rehabilitation programme, and erectile function was evaluated after surgery, and at 3, 8, 12 and 18 months, using the five‐item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF‐5) questionnaire.
RESULTS
The two groups had similar clinical characteristics (age, prostate‐specific antigen level, body mass index, prostate volume, clinical stage, Gleason score before and after surgery, postoperative stage). The follow‐up was complete for 12 men in group A and 10 in group B. Group A had significantly higher erectile function scores on the IIEF‐5 at 12 and 18 months than immediately after surgery (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05501.x |