A cost minimization model for the treatment of minor bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors
Treatment of acute bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) most often involves the use of bypassing haemostatic agents, such as activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). We constructed a cost minim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia 2005-05, Vol.11 (3), p.261-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Treatment of acute bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) most often involves the use of bypassing haemostatic agents, such as activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). We constructed a cost minimization model to compare the costs of initial treatment with aPCC vs. rFVIIa in the home treatment of minor bleeding episodes. We developed a clinical scenario describing such a case and presented it to a panel of US haemophilia specialists. For each product class, we asked panellists to provide dosing regimens required to achieve complete resolution of a minor haemarthrosis in a child with high‐titre inhibitors, and for the probabilities of success at two time points (8–12 and 24 h). Consensus among the panellists was refined by a second round of the process, and the median values resulting were used as inputs to a decision analysis model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine threshold values for key variables. The base case model found that initial treatment with aPCC would result in a mean cost per episode of $21 000, compared with $33 400 for initial treatment with rFVIIa. Sensitivity analyses over a range of clinically plausible values for cost, dosing, and efficacy did not change the selection of aPCC as the dominant strategy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1351-8216 1365-2516 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01098.x |