Management of dental trauma in primary care: a postal survey of general dental practitioners

Key Points An overview of the attitudes and beliefs of General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) with regard to the provision of treatment for traumatised teeth. Insight into the perceived level of confidence of GDPs in their ability to treat trauma cases. The barriers to care of trauma cases within the G...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British dental journal 2005-03, Vol.198 (5), p.293-297
Hauptverfasser: Waterhouse, P J, Jackson, N G, Maguire, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Key Points An overview of the attitudes and beliefs of General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) with regard to the provision of treatment for traumatised teeth. Insight into the perceived level of confidence of GDPs in their ability to treat trauma cases. The barriers to care of trauma cases within the General Dental Service, as highlighted by GDPs themselves. Suggestion that communication between primary and secondary care providers could be improved, offering benefits to appropriate care provision Objectives To determine the self-perceived knowledge and attitudes of general dental practitioners (GDPs) concerning management of dental trauma in primary care. To identify potential barriers to the management of dental trauma in primary care. Design and setting A self-completion postal questionnaire survey of 417 GDPs in six local health authority districts in northeast England. Main outcome measures Likert scale responses to 20 statements designed to test self-perceived knowledge and attitudes. Following descriptive statistical analysis. Factor analysis with principle components analysis was undertaken to identify areas of correlation in questionnaire responses, followed by Chi squared test, Spearman's Rank Correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to measure association between variables. Results The response rate was 74%. Enamel and dentine fractures were the most common injury, with 45% of GDPs responding seeing more than 10 cases of dental trauma in the preceding year and 53% of respondents seeing one to three cases of complicated crown fracture. Seventy-eight per cent believed that NHS remuneration was inadequate, but only 8% would refer patients with dental trauma to secondary care for this reason. Half of the GDPs believed that trauma could be treated more effectively in practice if NHS payments were greater. GDPs were significantly more likely to agree with this statement if they had previously undertaken a postgraduate course in the treatment of dental trauma (p=0.002). Single handed GDPs were statistically significantly more likely to agree with the statements 'I would not treat dental trauma cases at my practice because the NHS payment is inadequate' (p=0.008) and 'Treating dental trauma at my practice requires too much of my clinical time to be worthwhile' (p=0.002). Ninety-six per cent of GDPs disagreed that treatment of dental trauma rested solely within secondary care. Ninety-six per cent of GDPs agreed that they had a responsibility to provide
ISSN:0007-0610
1476-5373
DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4812127