Noninvasive detection of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis coupled with assessment of changes in plaque characteristics using novel invasive imaging modalities : The integrated biomarker and imaging study (IBIS)

Our purpose was to assess noninvasive imaging in detection of subclinical atherosclerosis and to examine novel invasive modalities to describe prevalence and temporal changes in putative characteristics of "high-risk" plaques. Conventional coronary imaging cannot identify "high-risk&q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2006-03, Vol.47 (6), p.1134-1142
Hauptverfasser: VAN MIEGHEM, Carlos A. G, MCFADDEN, Eugène P, VALGIMIGLI, Marco, MASTIK, Frits, VAN DER STEEN, Anton F, VAN DER GIESSEN, Willem J, SIANOS, Georgios, BACKX, Bianca, MOREL, Marie-Angèle M, VAN ES, Gerrit-Anne, ZALEWSKI, Andrew, SERRUYS, Patrick W, DE FEYTER, Pim J, BRUINING, Nico, SCHAAR, Johannes A, MOLLET, Nico R, CADEMARTIRI, Filippo, GOEDHART, Dick, DE WINTER, Sebastiaan, RODRIGUEZ GRANILLO, Gaston
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Our purpose was to assess noninvasive imaging in detection of subclinical atherosclerosis and to examine novel invasive modalities to describe prevalence and temporal changes in putative characteristics of "high-risk" plaques. Conventional coronary imaging cannot identify "high-risk" lesions. Conventional (quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound [IVUS]) and novel imaging (IVUS-based palpography and gray scale echogenicity) were performed at baseline and 6 months later in 67 patients with diverse clinical presentations. Different imaging techniques were compared within a common segment defined by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Compared with IVUS, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of MSCT for detecting significant plaque was 86%, 69%, 90%, and 61%, respectively. In coronary arteries with
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.075