Risk Factors for Buruli Ulcer Disease (Mycobacterium ulcerans Infection): Results from a Case-Control Study in Ghana

Background Morbidity due to Buruli ulcer disease (BUD), a cutaneous infection caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, has been increasingly recognized in rural West Africa. The source and mode of transmission remain unknown. Methods To identify BUD risk factors, we conducted a case-control study in 3 BUD-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2005-05, Vol.40 (10), p.1445-1453
Hauptverfasser: Raghunathan, Pratima L., Whitney, Ellen A.S., Asamoa, Kwame, Stienstra, Ymkje, Taylor, Thomas H., Amofah, George K., Ofori-Adjei, David, Dobos, Karen, Guarner, Jeannette, Martin, Stacey, Pathak, Sonal, Klutse, Erasmus, Etuaful, Samuel, van der Graaf, Winette T.A., van der Werf, Tjip S., King, C.H., Tappero, Jordan W., Ashford, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Morbidity due to Buruli ulcer disease (BUD), a cutaneous infection caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, has been increasingly recognized in rural West Africa. The source and mode of transmission remain unknown. Methods To identify BUD risk factors, we conducted a case-control study in 3 BUD-endemic districts in Ghana. We enrolled case patients with clinically diagnosed BUD and obtained skin biopsy specimens. M. ulcerans infection was confirmed by at least 1 of the following diagnostic methods: histopathologic analysis, culture, polymerase chain reaction, and Ziehl-Neelsen staining of a lesion smear. We compared characteristics of case patients with confirmed BUD with those of age- and community-matched control subjects using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results Among 121 case patients with confirmed BUD, leg lesions (49%) or arm lesions (36%) were common. Male case patients were significantly more likely than female case patients to have lesions on the trunk (25% vs. 6%; P = .009). Multivariable modeling among 116 matched case-control pairs identified wading in a river as a risk factor for BUD (odds ratio [OR], 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–5.68; P = .0096). Wearing a shirt while farming (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11–0.70; P = .0071), sharing indoor living space with livestock (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15–0.86; P = .022), and bathing with toilet soap (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19–0.90; P = .026) appeared to be protective. BUD was not significantly associated with penetrating injuries (P = .14), insect bites near water bodies (P = .84), bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination (P = .33), or human immunodeficiency virus infection (P = .99). Conclusions BUD is an environmentally acquired infection strongly associated with exposure to river areas. Exposed skin may facilitate transmission. Until transmission is better defined, control strategies in BUD-endemic areas could include covering exposed skin.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1086/429623