A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve adults
Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2005-05, Vol.23 (25), p.3301-3309 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3309 |
---|---|
container_issue | 25 |
container_start_page | 3301 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Artenstein, Andrew W. Johnson, Casey Marbury, Thomas C. Morrison, Dennis Blum, Paul S. Kemp, Tracy Nichols, Richard Balser, John P. Currie, Michelle Monath, Thomas P. |
description | Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled trial at four sites in the United States to determine whether a clonal smallpox vaccine manufactured in cell culture, ACAM2000, is equivalent to the standard calf-lymph vaccine, Dryvax
®, in terms of cutaneous response rate, antibody responses and safety. Subjects received either Dryvax
® or one of four dose levels of ACAM2000 administered percutaneously using a bifurcated needle. All subjects in the highest ACAM2000 dose group and the Dryvax
® group experienced a successful vaccination. Dilution doses of ACAM2000 were associated with success rates below the 90% threshold established for efficacy. There were no differences in the proportion of subjects who developed neutralizing antibody: 94% in the highest ACAM2000 dose group (95% CI, 84–99) and 96% in the Dryvax
® group (95% CI, 86–100). No significant differences were seen between the effective ACAM2000 and Dryvax
® groups regarding the occurrence of adverse events. One subject who received ACAM2000 developed myopericarditis. In healthy, primary vaccines ACAM2000 has a similar vaccination success rate, antibody response, and safety profile to Dryvax. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67758690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X05001209</els_id><sourcerecordid>67758690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3ea4c954aff75ea4a711ef81dab1b83f66a7bbc19bc074a24f1a5797413bef0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVJaTZJHyHBENJT7WgsybJPJYS2CQR6SaA3MZZHoMVrb6W1SZ-qD5EXi5Y1BHrJaebw_TP_zM_YOfACOFTX62JGa_1ARcm5KjgUXDcf2ApqLfJSQX3EVrysZC6B_z5mJzGueQIFNJ_YMaha6FJUK3Z3kw3jTP3XzFLfZ3bqd1OgvKPgZ-qyuMG-347P2bIs88PSeswHfPk3U4ZdEsUz9tFhH-nzUk_Z04_vj7d3-cOvn_e3Nw-5larc5YJQ2kZJdE6r1KMGIFdDhy20tXBVhbptLTSt5VpiKR2g0o2WIFpynMQp-3KYuw3jn4nizmx83HvHgcYpmkprVVcNfxcEXUouhE7g5X_gepzCkI4woFSTbPC6SpQ6UDaMMQZyZhv8BsNfA9zsEzFrszzJ7BMxHExKJOkululTu6HuTbVEkICrBcBosXcBB-vjG5fOaaQWift24Ch9d_YUTLSeBkudD2R3phv9O1ZeAfZ6rC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559074086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Artenstein, Andrew W. ; Johnson, Casey ; Marbury, Thomas C. ; Morrison, Dennis ; Blum, Paul S. ; Kemp, Tracy ; Nichols, Richard ; Balser, John P. ; Currie, Michelle ; Monath, Thomas P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Artenstein, Andrew W. ; Johnson, Casey ; Marbury, Thomas C. ; Morrison, Dennis ; Blum, Paul S. ; Kemp, Tracy ; Nichols, Richard ; Balser, John P. ; Currie, Michelle ; Monath, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled trial at four sites in the United States to determine whether a clonal smallpox vaccine manufactured in cell culture, ACAM2000, is equivalent to the standard calf-lymph vaccine, Dryvax
®, in terms of cutaneous response rate, antibody responses and safety. Subjects received either Dryvax
® or one of four dose levels of ACAM2000 administered percutaneously using a bifurcated needle. All subjects in the highest ACAM2000 dose group and the Dryvax
® group experienced a successful vaccination. Dilution doses of ACAM2000 were associated with success rates below the 90% threshold established for efficacy. There were no differences in the proportion of subjects who developed neutralizing antibody: 94% in the highest ACAM2000 dose group (95% CI, 84–99) and 96% in the Dryvax
® group (95% CI, 86–100). No significant differences were seen between the effective ACAM2000 and Dryvax
® groups regarding the occurrence of adverse events. One subject who received ACAM2000 developed myopericarditis. In healthy, primary vaccines ACAM2000 has a similar vaccination success rate, antibody response, and safety profile to Dryvax.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15837236</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibodies, Viral - analysis ; Antibodies, Viral - biosynthesis ; Applied microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cells, Cultured ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Immunization ; Laboratories ; Male ; Microbiology ; Myopericarditis ; Neutralization Tests ; Pericarditis - etiology ; Smallpox ; Smallpox vaccine ; Smallpox Vaccine - adverse effects ; Smallpox Vaccine - immunology ; Treatment Outcome ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects) ; Vaccinia ; Vaccinia - epidemiology ; Variola virus</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2005-05, Vol.23 (25), p.3301-3309</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 9, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3ea4c954aff75ea4a711ef81dab1b83f66a7bbc19bc074a24f1a5797413bef0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3ea4c954aff75ea4a711ef81dab1b83f66a7bbc19bc074a24f1a5797413bef0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X05001209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17589473$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15837236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Artenstein, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marbury, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balser, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monath, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><title>A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve adults</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled trial at four sites in the United States to determine whether a clonal smallpox vaccine manufactured in cell culture, ACAM2000, is equivalent to the standard calf-lymph vaccine, Dryvax
®, in terms of cutaneous response rate, antibody responses and safety. Subjects received either Dryvax
® or one of four dose levels of ACAM2000 administered percutaneously using a bifurcated needle. All subjects in the highest ACAM2000 dose group and the Dryvax
® group experienced a successful vaccination. Dilution doses of ACAM2000 were associated with success rates below the 90% threshold established for efficacy. There were no differences in the proportion of subjects who developed neutralizing antibody: 94% in the highest ACAM2000 dose group (95% CI, 84–99) and 96% in the Dryvax
® group (95% CI, 86–100). No significant differences were seen between the effective ACAM2000 and Dryvax
® groups regarding the occurrence of adverse events. One subject who received ACAM2000 developed myopericarditis. In healthy, primary vaccines ACAM2000 has a similar vaccination success rate, antibody response, and safety profile to Dryvax.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - analysis</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Applied microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Myopericarditis</subject><subject>Neutralization Tests</subject><subject>Pericarditis - etiology</subject><subject>Smallpox</subject><subject>Smallpox vaccine</subject><subject>Smallpox Vaccine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Smallpox Vaccine - immunology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</subject><subject>Vaccinia</subject><subject>Vaccinia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Variola virus</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVJaTZJHyHBENJT7WgsybJPJYS2CQR6SaA3MZZHoMVrb6W1SZ-qD5EXi5Y1BHrJaebw_TP_zM_YOfACOFTX62JGa_1ARcm5KjgUXDcf2ApqLfJSQX3EVrysZC6B_z5mJzGueQIFNJ_YMaha6FJUK3Z3kw3jTP3XzFLfZ3bqd1OgvKPgZ-qyuMG-347P2bIs88PSeswHfPk3U4ZdEsUz9tFhH-nzUk_Z04_vj7d3-cOvn_e3Nw-5larc5YJQ2kZJdE6r1KMGIFdDhy20tXBVhbptLTSt5VpiKR2g0o2WIFpynMQp-3KYuw3jn4nizmx83HvHgcYpmkprVVcNfxcEXUouhE7g5X_gepzCkI4woFSTbPC6SpQ6UDaMMQZyZhv8BsNfA9zsEzFrszzJ7BMxHExKJOkululTu6HuTbVEkICrBcBosXcBB-vjG5fOaaQWift24Ch9d_YUTLSeBkudD2R3phv9O1ZeAfZ6rC0</recordid><startdate>20050509</startdate><enddate>20050509</enddate><creator>Artenstein, Andrew W.</creator><creator>Johnson, Casey</creator><creator>Marbury, Thomas C.</creator><creator>Morrison, Dennis</creator><creator>Blum, Paul S.</creator><creator>Kemp, Tracy</creator><creator>Nichols, Richard</creator><creator>Balser, John P.</creator><creator>Currie, Michelle</creator><creator>Monath, Thomas P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050509</creationdate><title>A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve adults</title><author>Artenstein, Andrew W. ; Johnson, Casey ; Marbury, Thomas C. ; Morrison, Dennis ; Blum, Paul S. ; Kemp, Tracy ; Nichols, Richard ; Balser, John P. ; Currie, Michelle ; Monath, Thomas P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3ea4c954aff75ea4a711ef81dab1b83f66a7bbc19bc074a24f1a5797413bef0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - analysis</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Applied microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Myopericarditis</topic><topic>Neutralization Tests</topic><topic>Pericarditis - etiology</topic><topic>Smallpox</topic><topic>Smallpox vaccine</topic><topic>Smallpox Vaccine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Smallpox Vaccine - immunology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</topic><topic>Vaccinia</topic><topic>Vaccinia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Variola virus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Artenstein, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marbury, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balser, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monath, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Artenstein, Andrew W.</au><au>Johnson, Casey</au><au>Marbury, Thomas C.</au><au>Morrison, Dennis</au><au>Blum, Paul S.</au><au>Kemp, Tracy</au><au>Nichols, Richard</au><au>Balser, John P.</au><au>Currie, Michelle</au><au>Monath, Thomas P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve adults</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2005-05-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>3301</spage><epage>3309</epage><pages>3301-3309</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled trial at four sites in the United States to determine whether a clonal smallpox vaccine manufactured in cell culture, ACAM2000, is equivalent to the standard calf-lymph vaccine, Dryvax
®, in terms of cutaneous response rate, antibody responses and safety. Subjects received either Dryvax
® or one of four dose levels of ACAM2000 administered percutaneously using a bifurcated needle. All subjects in the highest ACAM2000 dose group and the Dryvax
® group experienced a successful vaccination. Dilution doses of ACAM2000 were associated with success rates below the 90% threshold established for efficacy. There were no differences in the proportion of subjects who developed neutralizing antibody: 94% in the highest ACAM2000 dose group (95% CI, 84–99) and 96% in the Dryvax
® group (95% CI, 86–100). No significant differences were seen between the effective ACAM2000 and Dryvax
® groups regarding the occurrence of adverse events. One subject who received ACAM2000 developed myopericarditis. In healthy, primary vaccines ACAM2000 has a similar vaccination success rate, antibody response, and safety profile to Dryvax.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15837236</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.079</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2005-05, Vol.23 (25), p.3301-3309 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67758690 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Antibodies, Viral - analysis Antibodies, Viral - biosynthesis Applied microbiology Biological and medical sciences Cells, Cultured Double-Blind Method Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Immunization Laboratories Male Microbiology Myopericarditis Neutralization Tests Pericarditis - etiology Smallpox Smallpox vaccine Smallpox Vaccine - adverse effects Smallpox Vaccine - immunology Treatment Outcome Vaccines Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects) Vaccinia Vaccinia - epidemiology Variola virus |
title | A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20novel,%20cell%20culture-derived%20smallpox%20vaccine%20in%20vaccinia-na%C3%AFve%20adults&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Artenstein,%20Andrew%20W.&rft.date=2005-05-09&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=3301&rft.epage=3309&rft.pages=3301-3309&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67758690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559074086&rft_id=info:pmid/15837236&rft_els_id=S0264410X05001209&rfr_iscdi=true |