A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve adults

Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2005-05, Vol.23 (25), p.3301-3309
Hauptverfasser: Artenstein, Andrew W., Johnson, Casey, Marbury, Thomas C., Morrison, Dennis, Blum, Paul S., Kemp, Tracy, Nichols, Richard, Balser, John P., Currie, Michelle, Monath, Thomas P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled trial at four sites in the United States to determine whether a clonal smallpox vaccine manufactured in cell culture, ACAM2000, is equivalent to the standard calf-lymph vaccine, Dryvax ®, in terms of cutaneous response rate, antibody responses and safety. Subjects received either Dryvax ® or one of four dose levels of ACAM2000 administered percutaneously using a bifurcated needle. All subjects in the highest ACAM2000 dose group and the Dryvax ® group experienced a successful vaccination. Dilution doses of ACAM2000 were associated with success rates below the 90% threshold established for efficacy. There were no differences in the proportion of subjects who developed neutralizing antibody: 94% in the highest ACAM2000 dose group (95% CI, 84–99) and 96% in the Dryvax ® group (95% CI, 86–100). No significant differences were seen between the effective ACAM2000 and Dryvax ® groups regarding the occurrence of adverse events. One subject who received ACAM2000 developed myopericarditis. In healthy, primary vaccines ACAM2000 has a similar vaccination success rate, antibody response, and safety profile to Dryvax.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.079