Minimizing resistance consequences after virologic failure on initial combination therapy : A systematic overview

To identify optimal first-line therapies based on the rate of virologic success (VS) and the preservation of future treatment options in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive subjects. Systematic overview of genotypic resistance mutations from clinical trials of combination ART. Various sources were se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2006-03, Vol.41 (3), p.323-331
Hauptverfasser: BARTLETT, John A, BUDA, Jeffrey J, VON SCHEELE, Birgitta, MAUSKOPF, Josephine A, DAVIS, E. Anne, ELSTON, Robert, KING, Martin S, LANIER, E. Randall
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To identify optimal first-line therapies based on the rate of virologic success (VS) and the preservation of future treatment options in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive subjects. Systematic overview of genotypic resistance mutations from clinical trials of combination ART. Various sources were searched for studies in ART-naive subjects providing virologic response rates and genotypes from subjects with virologic failure. The International AIDS Society-USA genotypic resistance guidelines were used to calculate regimen resistance cost (RCreg) and number of active drug (AD) scores for each regimen and to rank the regimens. Intra- and interstudy comparisons showed higher VS rates for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens (range: 51%-76%) and boosted protease inhibitor (boosted PI) regimens (range: 55%-79%). Boosted PI failures had the lowest RCreg (range: 0.12-0.21) and the highest AD (range: 19.80-20.18) scores. NNRTI failures had higher RCreg (range: 0.00-1.22) and lower AD (range: 16.83-21) scores. NNRTI and boosted PI regimens provide the highest rates of VS in treatment-naive HIV-infected persons. Treatment option scores were higher in subjects who failed boosted PI- containing regimens versus NNRTI-containing regimens, however.
ISSN:1525-4135
1944-7884
DOI:10.1097/01.qai.0000197070.69859.f3