A randomized comparison of oral chloramphenicol versus ofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in Laos
We conducted a randomized open trial of oral chloramphenicol (50 mg/kg/day in four divided doses for 14 days) versus ofloxacin (15 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 3 days) in 50 adults with culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Vientiane, Laos. Patients had been ill for a median (range)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2005-06, Vol.99 (6), p.451-458 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We conducted a randomized open trial of oral chloramphenicol (50
mg/kg/day in four divided doses for 14 days) versus ofloxacin (15
mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 3 days) in 50 adults with culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Vientiane, Laos. Patients had been ill for a median (range) of 8 (2–30) days. All
Salmonella enterica serotype typhi isolates were nalidixic acid-sensitive, four (8%) were chloramphenicol-resistant and three (6%) were multidrug-resistant. Median (range) fever clearance times were 90 (24–224) hours in the chloramphenicol group and 54 (6–93) hours in the ofloxacin group (
P
<
0.001). One patient in the chloramphenicol group developed an ileal perforation. Three days ofloxacin was more effective than 14 days chloramphenicol for the in-patient treatment of typhoid fever, irrespective of antibiotic susceptibility, and was of similar cost. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0035-9203 1878-3503 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.08.007 |