Nonoptimal propagation of advertisement calls of midwife toads in Iberian habitats
This study compares the efficiency of transmission of the advertisement calls of two species of midwife toads, Alytes cisternasii and A . obstetricans , in both native and non-native habitats in the Iberian Peninsula. Recorded calls of both species and pure tones were broadcast at ten sites native t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006-02, Vol.119 (2), p.1227-1237 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study compares the efficiency of transmission of the advertisement calls of two species of midwife toads,
Alytes cisternasii
and
A
.
obstetricans
, in both native and non-native habitats in the Iberian Peninsula. Recorded calls of both species and pure tones were broadcast at ten sites native to either the relatively small
A
.
cisternasii
or the larger
A
.
obstetricans
. A large variation in the patterns of excess attenuation between localities was observed for calls measured at distances of
0.5
to
8
m
from a loudspeaker. However, attenuation rates were higher for calls of both species in habitats of
A
.
obstetricans
relative to habitats of
A
.
cisternasii
. The calls of
A
.
obstetricans
experienced lower attenuation rates than those of
A
.
cisternasii
in both conspecific and heterospecific localities. Thus, although
A
.
cisternasii
occupies habitats more favorable for sound transmission, its advertisement call spectrum is not optimized for these habitats; the calls of
A
.
obstetricans
suffer less attenuation in
A
.
cisternasii
habitats. This result argues against the notion that spectral features of the calls are adapted to enhance transmission efficiency in natural habitats, and suggests that differences in call dominant frequency between the two species result from constraints imposed by selection on body size. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
DOI: | 10.1121/1.2149769 |