Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing

Introduction In this study, we aimed to evaluate the fluoride-release profiles and caries lesion development in an enamel model with brackets cemented with 4 orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride exposure. Methods Four orthodontic adhesives (Ketac Cem μ, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany; Fu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2009-10, Vol.136 (4), p.547-553
Hauptverfasser: Chin, Mervyn Y.H, Sandham, Andrew, Rumachik, Elena N, Ruben, Jan L, Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte D.N.J.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction In this study, we aimed to evaluate the fluoride-release profiles and caries lesion development in an enamel model with brackets cemented with 4 orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride exposure. Methods Four orthodontic adhesives (Ketac Cem μ, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany; Fuji Ortho LC, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; Light-Bond, Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, Ill; and Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were used. Brackets were bonded on bovine enamel with each adhesive (n = 10) and subjected to alternate cycles of demineralizing (pH 4.55) and remineralizing (pH 6.8) solutions. Unbracketed enamel samples served as a reference. Five samples from each group were immersed in a fluoride mouth rinse (250 ppm fluoride) for 1 minute each day (test groups). Fluoride release was measured at regular intervals over 28 days. The mineral distribution of peribracket enamel after 28 days was quantified by transversal microradiographs. Results Fluoride-release profiles of Ketac Cem μ, Fuji Ortho LC, and Light-Bond were high for the first 24 hours and reached a constant level after 2 weeks. Fuji Ortho LC released significantly more fluoride than did the other adhesives in both the control and test groups ( P
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.053