Mortality and Technique Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Using Advanced Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions

Background Despite the theoretical benefits of biocompatible physiological-pH bicarbonate/lactate-buffered (B/L) peritoneal dialysis solution, there is only limited evidence supporting a superior clinical outcome associated with its use. Study Design Observational study. Settings & Participants...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of kidney diseases 2009-10, Vol.54 (4), p.711-720
Hauptverfasser: Han, Seung Hyeok, MD, PhD, Ahn, Song Vogue, MD, Yun, Jee Young, CRN, Tranaeus, Anders, MD, PhD, Han, Dae-Suk, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Despite the theoretical benefits of biocompatible physiological-pH bicarbonate/lactate-buffered (B/L) peritoneal dialysis solution, there is only limited evidence supporting a superior clinical outcome associated with its use. Study Design Observational study. Settings & Participants 2,163 patients starting peritoneal dialysis therapy between July 2003 and December 2006 from 54 centers in Korea were enrolled. Predictors B/L solution and icodextrin use. Outcomes All-cause mortality and technique failure. Measurements Patient outcomes were compared between patients prescribed B/L and conventional solutions by using propensity score and intention-to-treat analyses. Results 542 patients initiated peritoneal dialysis therapy with B/L solution, and 1,621, with conventional solution. Fifteen patients prescribed B/L solution switched to conventional solution, and 386 of those initially using conventional solution switched to B/L solution during follow-up. Propensity score matching yielded 542 matched pairs of patients. In the matched cohort, there were no significant differences in age, diabetes, cardiovascular comorbidity, socioeconomic status, icodextrin use, or center experience between the 2 groups. All-cause deaths occurred in 52 (9.6%) patients in the B/L-solution group compared with 102 (18.9%) in the conventional-solution group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.98; P = 0.04). In addition, icodextrin use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.58; P < 0.001). Thirty-three (6.1%) and 48 (8.9%) technique failures occurred in the B/L- and conventional-solution groups, respectively (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.43; P = 0.7). The survival benefit of B/L solution persisted in the unmatched cohort (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.93; P = 0.02). Limitations Retrospective analysis, lack of laboratory data, and unknown indications for use of B/L solution. Conclusion Use of a biocompatible B/L peritoneal dialysis solution with physiological pH is associated with improved survival compared with conventional solution. Large randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm this finding.
ISSN:0272-6386
1523-6838
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.05.014