The Effect of Biomicroscope Illumination System on Grading Anterior Chamber Inflammation

Purpose To determine how a biomicroscope illumination system affects the grading of anterior chamber (AC) inflammation. Design Laboratory investigation. Methods An artificial AC was designed to replicate optically a human AC and was filled with 5-μm polystyrene beads suspended in ethanol. A high-def...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2009-10, Vol.148 (4), p.516-520.e2
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Ira G, Nugent, Alex K, Vargas-Martín, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To determine how a biomicroscope illumination system affects the grading of anterior chamber (AC) inflammation. Design Laboratory investigation. Methods An artificial AC was designed to replicate optically a human AC and was filled with 5-μm polystyrene beads suspended in ethanol. A high-definition video eyepiece camera recorded the moving beads. Using image processing software, the main outcomes measures determined were the average number of beads in a 1 × 1-mm field at varying widths of the slit-beam. Results The volume of light and number of beads observed increased significantly as the slit-beam widened. Additionally, 3 separate biomicroscopes of identical make and model were found to produce different levels of luminance at the same aperture dial settings, influencing the number of beads observed, with the brighter biomicroscope yielding higher bead counts. Conclusions Ability to count beads and perhaps the ability to count inflammatory cells in an inflamed eye depend on a number of factors, including the level of illumination and width of the slit-beam. This study demonstrated that the brighter the illumination and the wider the beam, the more beads were observed. This illustrates the importance of standardizing biomicroscopy, particularly where consecutive observations are used to make clinical decisions and in cases of multicenter clinical trials where clinical data are evaluated across different facilities.
ISSN:0002-9394
1879-1891
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.027