Every-12-hour administration of extended-release divalproex in patients with epilepsy: Impact on plasma valproic acid concentrations

Extended-release divalproex sodium (divalproex-ER) biopharmaceutics after every-12-hour (q12h) administration was compared with that of once-daily divalproex-ER and conventional divalproex given every 6 hours (q6h) in a multiple-dose (14-day), randomized, three-period crossover design study in 24 pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsy & behavior 2006-03, Vol.8 (2), p.391-396
Hauptverfasser: Reed, Ronald C., Dutta, Sandeep, Cavanaugh, John H., Locke, Charles, Granneman, G. Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Extended-release divalproex sodium (divalproex-ER) biopharmaceutics after every-12-hour (q12h) administration was compared with that of once-daily divalproex-ER and conventional divalproex given every 6 hours (q6h) in a multiple-dose (14-day), randomized, three-period crossover design study in 24 patients with epilepsy concomitantly receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic medication(s). Plasma valproic acid (VPA) minimum concentration ( C min) for divalproex-ER q12h was higher than the once-daily divalproex-ER C min ( P = 0.043). Once-daily divalproex-ER C min values were not different from those for divalproex q6h, suggesting that adequate trough steady-state concentrations are maintained with once daily dosing, despite enzyme-inducing comedication. The degree of peak–trough fluctuation (DFL, calculated as ( C max − C min)/ C avg) in VPA concentration was less with both q12h (35.2% less) and once-daily (16.9% less) divalproex-ER regimens compared with q6h divalproex ( P ⩽ 0.024). The DFL for divalproex-ER dosed as a q12h regimen was 22% less than that for once-daily divalproex-ER ( P = 0.02). The DFL in VPA concentration with divalproex-ER can be minimized with once-daily administration and more so with q12h administration, compared with conventional enteric-coated divalproex taken q6h.
ISSN:1525-5050
1525-5069
DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.12.004