Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Left Ventricular Twist

Objectives This study explored the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) twist, particularly in relation to LV lead position. Background LV twist is emerging as a comprehensive index of LV function. Methods Eighty heart failure patients were included. Two-dimens...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2009-09, Vol.54 (14), p.1317-1325
Hauptverfasser: Bertini, Matteo, MD, Marsan, Nina Ajmone, MD, Delgado, Victoria, MD, van Bommel, Rutger J., MD, Nucifora, Gaetano, MD, Borleffs, C. Jan Willem, MD, Boriani, Giuseppe, MD, PhD, Biffi, Mauro, MD, Holman, Eduard R., MD, PhD, van der Wall, Ernst E., MD, PhD, Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD, Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives This study explored the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) twist, particularly in relation to LV lead position. Background LV twist is emerging as a comprehensive index of LV function. Methods Eighty heart failure patients were included. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed at baseline, immediately after CRT, and at 6-month follow-up. Speckle-tracking analysis was applied to assess LV twist. The LV lead was placed preferably in a (postero)lateral vein, and at fluoroscopy, the position was classified as basal, midventricular, or apical. Response to CRT was defined as reduction of LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at 6-month follow-up. A control group comprised 30 normal subjects. Results Peak LV twist in heart failure patients was 4.8 ± 2.6° compared with 15.0 ± 3.6° in the control subjects (p < 0.001). At 6-month follow-up, peak LV twist significantly improved only in responders (56%), from 4.3 ± 2.4° to 8.5 ± 3.2° (p < 0.001). The strongest predictor of response to CRT was the improvement of peak LV twist immediately after CRT (odds ratio: 1.899, 95% confidence interval: 1.334 to 2.703, p < 0.001). Furthermore, LV twist significantly improved in patients with an apical (from 4.3 ± 3.1° to 8.6 ± 3.0°, p = 0.001) and midventricular (from 4.8 ± 2.2° to 6.4 ± 3.9°, p = 0.038) but not with a basal (5.0 ± 3.3° vs. 4.1 ± 3.2°, p = 0.28) LV lead position. Similarly, LV ejection fraction significantly increased in patients with an apical (from 26 ± 7% to 37 ± 7%, p < 0.001) and midventricular (from 26 ± 6% to 33 ± 8%, p < 0.001) but not with a basal (26 ± 5% vs. 28 ± 8%, p = 0.30) LV lead position. Conclusions An immediate improvement of LV twist after CRT predicts LV reverse remodeling at 6-month follow-up.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.063