A “stitch in time”

While silk sutures are classified as non-absorbable, in reality there should be no evidence of the suture 2 years postoperatively as a result of a foreign body reaction. 2 3 However, the rate of suture degradation in vivo is dependent on a number of features including the site of implantation, the m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2009-10, Vol.58 (10), p.1341-1341
Hauptverfasser: Prichard, D, Zaheer, A, Ravi, N, Reynolds, J, Mahmud, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While silk sutures are classified as non-absorbable, in reality there should be no evidence of the suture 2 years postoperatively as a result of a foreign body reaction. 2 3 However, the rate of suture degradation in vivo is dependent on a number of features including the site of implantation, the mechanical and enzymatic environment, the silk used and the suture diameter. 2 3 4 5 In this case, with the suture in the biliary system, it was surprising that it was still in existence 30 years postoperatively.
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.2008.169508