A “stitch in time”
While silk sutures are classified as non-absorbable, in reality there should be no evidence of the suture 2 years postoperatively as a result of a foreign body reaction. 2 3 However, the rate of suture degradation in vivo is dependent on a number of features including the site of implantation, the m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2009-10, Vol.58 (10), p.1341-1341 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | While silk sutures are classified as non-absorbable, in reality there should be no evidence of the suture 2 years postoperatively as a result of a foreign body reaction. 2 3 However, the rate of suture degradation in vivo is dependent on a number of features including the site of implantation, the mechanical and enzymatic environment, the silk used and the suture diameter. 2 3 4 5 In this case, with the suture in the biliary system, it was surprising that it was still in existence 30 years postoperatively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
DOI: | 10.1136/gut.2008.169508 |