Enhanced Sensitivity of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography by Observing Wall Motion Abnormalities During the Recovery Phase After Acute Beta-Blocker Administration

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has a modest sensitivity for detecting single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). This study assessed the additional diagnostic value of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during recovery after acute administration of β blockers. The study populatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2006-02, Vol.97 (4), p.462-465
Hauptverfasser: Karagiannis, Stefanos E., Bax, Jeroen J., Elhendy, Abdou, Feringa, Herman H.H., Cokkinos, Dennis V., van Domburg, Ron, Simoons, Maarten, Poldermans, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has a modest sensitivity for detecting single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). This study assessed the additional diagnostic value of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during recovery after acute administration of β blockers. The study population consisted of 200 patients (mean 59 ± 11 years of age, 144 men), who underwent DSE. Images were acquired at rest, low dose, peak dose, and during recovery. Patients received intravenous metoprolol (1 to 5 mg/min). The dose was adjusted to achieve a recovery heart rate within a 10% range of heart rate at rest. Coronary angiography was performed within 2 months. Inducible new wall motion abnormalities were observed in 168 patients (84%) at peak stress. An additional 14 patients (7%) developed new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during recovery. CAD was detected in 182 patients (86 had single-vessel CAD). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DSE were 88%, 65%, and 73% at peak stress and 97%, 65%, and 74% during recovery. Sensitivity was particularly higher during recovery than during peak stress in patients with single-vessel CAD (98% vs 81%, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.075