A Pfannenstiel Single-site Nephrectomy and Nephroureterectomy: A Practical Application of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery

Objectives To present the initial clinical experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy performed completely through a Pfannenstiel incision. Methods Two patients underwent a single-site nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for the diagnosis of an enha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2009-09, Vol.74 (3), p.482-485
Hauptverfasser: Ponsky, Lee E, Steinway, Matthew L, Lengu, Irma J, Hartke, David M, Vourganti, Srinivas, Cherullo, Edward E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To present the initial clinical experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy performed completely through a Pfannenstiel incision. Methods Two patients underwent a single-site nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for the diagnosis of an enhancing renal parenchymal mass and a renal pelvic mass, respectively. In both cases, a 7.5-cm Pfannenstiel incision was made and GelPort was inserted. Trocars were placed through the access port, and nephrectomy was performed using standard and bariatric length laparoscopic instruments. Distal ureter was resected through the Pfannenstiel incision for nephroureterectomy. No additional ports were used as both procedures were completed via the Pfannenstiel approach. Results The procedures were completed in 187 and 409 minutes, respectively, without complication. Blood loss was estimated at 50 and 200 mL, respectively. Postoperatively, the patients required minimal analgesia. Patients were discharged on postoperative days 2 and 4, respectively. Conclusions LESS nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy using only a Pfannenstiel incision are technically feasible and reproducible in human beings if performed by surgeons with standard laparoscopic skills. Using standard and bariatric length laparoscopic instruments, the procedures were performed without complication, with minimal blood loss and minimal variance from standard laparoscopic techniques. We anticipate that this approach can be incorporated by the urologist adept at laparoscopic surgery and provides a practical application of LESS surgery for extirpative procedures.
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.002