Endobronchial Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Tool in Patients With Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Background The diagnostic yield and accuracy of new approaches to diagnose cancer should focus on comparison with established surgical techniques. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) to detect cancer in patients with radiographically abnormal m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2009-09, Vol.88 (3), p.896-902
Hauptverfasser: Gilbert, Sebastien, MD, Wilson, David O., MD, MPH, Christie, Neil A., MD, Pennathur, Arjun, MD, Luketich, James D., MD, Landreneau, Rodney J., MD, Close, John M., MS, PMSD, Schuchert, Matthew J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The diagnostic yield and accuracy of new approaches to diagnose cancer should focus on comparison with established surgical techniques. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) to detect cancer in patients with radiographically abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes. Methods The medical records of patients who underwent EBUS and had abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes (short-axis >1 cm and [or] positron emission topography-positive) over a 25 month period at the University of Pittsburgh were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data, cytology, and pathology results were entered in a database and analyzed. Results A total of 172 patients [male to female = 1.8:1; median age, 67 years (range, 20 to 90]) were included. The diagnostic yield of EBUS cytology was 79.7% (137 of 172). Pathologic testing was available in 68% (117 of 172) and 82% (96 of 117) had a diagnostic EBUS. The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS was 91.7%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were 88.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.3 to 94.3), 100% (95% CI, 85.9 to 100), 100% (95% CI, 92.4 to 100), and 80.6% (95% CI, 63.4 to 91.2), respectively. In 67 patients who had a suspected or biopsy-proven primary lung cancer, diagnostic yield was 86.6% and accuracy was 94.8%. In this subgroup the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 93% (95% CI, 76.5 to 98.9), 100% (95% CI, 69.9 to 100), 100% (95% CI, 85 to 100), and 83.3% (95% CI, 56.2 to 97.5). Conclusions Diagnostic performance data support the clinical usefulness of EBUS in the evaluation of patients with a radiographically abnormal mediastinum. It should be considered complementary to mediastinoscopy rather than substitutive.
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.021