Basal production of nitric oxide (NO) and non-NO vasodilators in the forearm microcirculation in Type 2 diabetes: Associations with blood pressure and HDL cholesterol

We examined basal forearm microcirculatory blood flow (FBF) using venous occlusive strain-gauge plethysmography in 47 middle-aged men and women [55 ± 1 years] with Type 2 diabetes and 15 age-matched healthy individuals [52 ± 3 years], all receiving aspirin. Blood flow was also measured following inf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes research and clinical practice 2006, Vol.71 (1), p.59-67
Hauptverfasser: Woodman, Richard J., Playford, David A., Watts, Gerald F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We examined basal forearm microcirculatory blood flow (FBF) using venous occlusive strain-gauge plethysmography in 47 middle-aged men and women [55 ± 1 years] with Type 2 diabetes and 15 age-matched healthy individuals [52 ± 3 years], all receiving aspirin. Blood flow was also measured following infusion of N G-monomethyl- l-arginine into the brachial artery to inhibit basal NO release (FBF + l-NMMA). Acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were administered to assess endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent functions. Compared with controls, diabetic subjects had significantly lower vasodilatory responses to ACh and SNP ( p < 0.05 for each). Basal FBF and FBF + l-NMMA were increased in diabetic subjects compared with controls (2.4 ± 0.2 ml/100 ml/min versus 1.7 ± 0.2 ml/100 ml/min, p = 0.02 and 1.9 ± 0.1 ml/100 ml/min versus 1.2 + 0.1 ml/100 ml/min, p = 0.01, respectively) whereas the change in FBF following l-NMMA was greater in the controls (−27% versus −19%, p = 0.05). Amongst the diabetic subjects, pulse pressure and HDL cholesterol were independent predictors of FBF ( b = 0.04 ± 0.01, adjusted r 2 = 0.21 and p = 0.001, and b = 3.3 ± 1.2, adjusted r 2 = 0.12 and p = 0.007, respectively) and FBF + l-NMMA ( b = 0.03 ± 0.01, adjusted r 2 = 0.20, p = 0.002 and b = 2.1 ± 0.9, adjusted r 2 = 0.09 and p = 0.02, respectively). Diastolic blood pressure predicted the change in FBF with l-NMMA ( b = −1.02 ± 0.32, adjusted r 2 = 0.20 and p = 0.003). Our findings suggest that well controlled T2DM patients have impaired agonist-mediated vasodilatation of the forearm resistance arteries that is associated with impaired basal release of nitric oxide but an increase in the release of non-NO vasodilators. The latter may be a compensatory response to increased arterial stiffness and may be facilitated by an effect of HDL.
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2005.05.008