Physiologic Effects of the TASER After Exercise

Objectives:  Incidents of sudden death following TASER exposure are poorly studied, and substantive links between TASER exposure and sudden death are minimal. The authors studied the effects of a single TASER exposure on markers of physiologic stress in humans. Methods:  This prospective, controlled...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2009-08, Vol.16 (8), p.704-710
Hauptverfasser: Vilke, Gary M., Sloane, Christian M., Suffecool, Amanda, Kolkhorst, Fred W., Neuman, Tom S., Castillo, Edward M., Chan, Theodore C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives:  Incidents of sudden death following TASER exposure are poorly studied, and substantive links between TASER exposure and sudden death are minimal. The authors studied the effects of a single TASER exposure on markers of physiologic stress in humans. Methods:  This prospective, controlled study evaluated the effects of a TASER exposure on healthy police volunteers after vigorous exercise, compared to a subsequent, identical exercise session that was not followed by TASER exposure. Subjects exercised to 85% of predicted heart rate (HR) on an ergometer and then were given a standard 5‐second TASER activation. Measures before and for 60 minutes after the TASER activation included minute ventilation, tidal volume, respiratory rate, end‐tidal pCO2, oxygen saturation, HR, blood pressure (systolic BP/diastolic BP), 12‐lead electrocardiogram, and arterialized blood for pH, pO2, pCO2, and lactate. Each subject repeated the exercise and data collection session on a subsequent data, without TASER activation. Data were analyzed using paired Student’s t‐tests with differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results:  A total of 25 officers (21 men and 4 women) completed both portions of the study. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, the TASER group was significantly higher for systolic BP at baseline (difference of 14.1, 95% CI = 8.7 to 19.5, p 
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00458.x