Physiologic Effects of the TASER After Exercise
Objectives: Incidents of sudden death following TASER exposure are poorly studied, and substantive links between TASER exposure and sudden death are minimal. The authors studied the effects of a single TASER exposure on markers of physiologic stress in humans. Methods: This prospective, controlled...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic emergency medicine 2009-08, Vol.16 (8), p.704-710 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives: Incidents of sudden death following TASER exposure are poorly studied, and substantive links between TASER exposure and sudden death are minimal. The authors studied the effects of a single TASER exposure on markers of physiologic stress in humans.
Methods: This prospective, controlled study evaluated the effects of a TASER exposure on healthy police volunteers after vigorous exercise, compared to a subsequent, identical exercise session that was not followed by TASER exposure. Subjects exercised to 85% of predicted heart rate (HR) on an ergometer and then were given a standard 5‐second TASER activation. Measures before and for 60 minutes after the TASER activation included minute ventilation, tidal volume, respiratory rate, end‐tidal pCO2, oxygen saturation, HR, blood pressure (systolic BP/diastolic BP), 12‐lead electrocardiogram, and arterialized blood for pH, pO2, pCO2, and lactate. Each subject repeated the exercise and data collection session on a subsequent data, without TASER activation. Data were analyzed using paired Student’s t‐tests with differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Results: A total of 25 officers (21 men and 4 women) completed both portions of the study. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, the TASER group was significantly higher for systolic BP at baseline (difference of 14.1, 95% CI = 8.7 to 19.5, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1069-6563 1553-2712 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00458.x |