Comparison of Coronary Arterial Finding by Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With “Transient No-Reflow” Versus “Reflow” During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Previous studies have shown that transient no-reflow during coronary intervention but with Thrombosis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow at the completion of the procedure is associated with increased in-hospital and 6-month mortality. We hypothesized that the use of intravascular ultrasound before intervention could identify morphologic features that were predictive of transient no-reflow in patients who had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We analyzed 220 patients with ACS who had suitable intravascular ultrasound images that were acquired before intervention. We defined “transient no-reflow” as TIMI grade 0, 1, or 2 flow during the procedure and TIMI grade 3 flow at the completion of the procedure. We defined “reflow” as good coronary flow (TIMI grade 3 flow) during and after the procedure. Patients were categorized to a transient no-reflow group (n = 20) or a reflow group (n = 200). In the transient no-reflow group, vessel area and amount of plaque burden in the culprit lesion were significantly greater than in the reflow group (vessel 20.8 ± 5.4 vs 16.4 ± 6.2 mm 2, p