A randomized phase II trial comparing every 3-weeks carboplatin/paclitaxel with every 3-weeks carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Background: The optimal schedule of taxane administration has been an area of active interest in several recent clinical trials. Methods: To address a pure schedule question, we randomized 161 patients with advanced stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to either paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of oncology 2006-01, Vol.17 (1), p.104-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: The optimal schedule of taxane administration has been an area of active interest in several recent clinical trials. Methods: To address a pure schedule question, we randomized 161 patients with advanced stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to either paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 cycles or 75 mg/m2/week × 12 (cumulative dose on each arm = 900 mg/m2). Both arms received concurrent carboplatin AUC 6 every 3 weeks × 4 cycles. Results: The two arms were well-balanced in terms of known prognostic factors. The overall response rate and survival outcomes were similar on the two arms. There was significantly more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and grade 2–4 anemia on the weekly arm but less severe myalgias/arthralgias and alopecia. No difference in the rates of peripheral neuropathy was observed; however, patients on the every 3 weeks arm reported significantly more taxane therapy-related side-effects on the functional assessment of cancer therapy taxane subscale. Conclusions: This randomized trial exploring schedule-related issues with carboplatin/paclitaxel confirms the versatility of this regimen. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annonc/mdj016 |