Effect of hypothermia on transthoracic defibrillation in a swine model
Induced hypothermia (H) appears a promising intervention to protect the heart and brain after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. However, the influence of H on transthoracic defibrillation energy requirements is not well documented. In 39 swine (21.4 ± 1.3(S.E.) kg) hypothermia was induced by surrou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resuscitation 2005-04, Vol.65 (1), p.79-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Induced hypothermia (H) appears a promising intervention to protect the heart and brain after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. However, the influence of H on transthoracic defibrillation energy requirements is not well documented.
In 39 swine (21.4
±
1.3(S.E.) kg) hypothermia was induced by surrounding the head, thorax and abdomen with ice. The swine were divided into four groups: (1) normothermia (N) followed by severe H (30
°C) (
n
=
10), (2) severe H followed by N (
n
=
10), (3) N followed by moderate H (33
°C) (
n
=
10) and (4) moderate H followed by N (
n
=
9). After 30
s of electrically induced ventricular fibrillation (VF), the swine were defibrillated (biphasic waveform) at energies of 20
J, 30
J, 50
J and 100
J in random order in both N and H conditions.
For pigs in Group 1 (N followed by severe H), shock success in terminating VF was higher during hypothermia (odds ratio 4.09 (95% CI: 2.21, 5.58;
p
<
0.0001), despite the fact that impedance rose from 39
±
3
Ω (N) to 42
±
3
Ω (H) (
p
<
0.001) and current fell from 22
±
8 (N) to 21
±
7
A (H) (
p
<
0.001). There were no significant differences in the shock success between N and H for the other groups. Post-defibrillation ventricular asystole occurred less often during hypothermia compared to normothermia (
p
=
0.0002).
Severe H facilitated transthoracic defibrillation in this swine model. Since impedance rose and current fell during H, the improved shock success must be due to a hypothermia-induced change in the mechanical or electrophysiologic properties of the myocardium. Moderate hypothermia did not alter the energy requirement for defibrillation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-9572 1873-1570 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.013 |