Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces

Statement of problem Although it is known that different dental rotary instrument types produce distinct surface roughness of the axial walls which may contribute to the clinical performance of a cast restoration, the ideal roughness that produces optimum wetting at the adhesive interface is unclear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2009-08, Vol.102 (2), p.81-88
Hauptverfasser: Ayad, Mohamed F., BDS, MScD, PhD, Johnston, William M., PhD, Rosenstiel, Stephen F., BDS, MSD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Statement of problem Although it is known that different dental rotary instrument types produce distinct surface roughness of the axial walls which may contribute to the clinical performance of a cast restoration, the ideal roughness that produces optimum wetting at the adhesive interface is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the surface roughness and its influence on wettability of teeth prepared for complete veneer crowns with different dental rotary instruments. Material and methods Sixty standardized tooth preparations for complete crowns were completed using a modified milling machine on extracted human teeth with diamond, tungsten carbide finishing, and cross-cut carbide rotary instruments of similar shape (n=20). Morphological changes obtained were investigated with a surface texture analyzer. Two additional specimens from each group were treated and prepared for scanning electron microscopy. The contact angle of a drop of distilled water on each of the prepared surfaces was used as the measure of wettability with a goniometer microscope. The data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test (α=.05). Results Surface preparation resulted in significant differences for surface topography and wettability ( P
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60114-1