Surgical reintervention in acromegaly: is it still worth trying?

There has not been a formal evaluation of how frequently and to what extent surgical reintervention in patients with persistently active acromegaly may achieve significant, albeit incomplete, reductions in growth hormone (GH) and insulinlike growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. Of importance, recent stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine practice 2009-07, Vol.15 (5), p.431-437
Hauptverfasser: Espinosa de los Monteros, Ana Laura, González, Baldomero, Vargas, Guadalupe, Sosa, Ernesto, Guinto, Gerardo, Mercado, Moisés
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There has not been a formal evaluation of how frequently and to what extent surgical reintervention in patients with persistently active acromegaly may achieve significant, albeit incomplete, reductions in growth hormone (GH) and insulinlike growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. Of importance, recent studies suggest that the response to radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy is better with lower degrees of hypersomatotropism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical reintervention in patients with active acromegaly at our institution between 1995 and 2005. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome in 53 patients with active acromegaly (49 with macroadenomas) who underwent a second operation a mean of 24.1 +/- 25.2 months after the first intervention. Basal and postglucose GH as well as IGF-I levels were analyzed at diagnosis and after the first and second pituitary procedures. Basal GH decreased in 38 patients (72%): to
ISSN:1530-891X
1934-2403
DOI:10.4158/EP09066.ORR